Could the Big East (and the WAC) (re)build (FCS) FB leagues?
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 11:33 am
The WAC is adding Tarleton State for Olympic sports, and all of a sudden there is talk that there is a long-term goal of bringing back FB in the FCS classification.
I'm finding it hard to believe UConn is long for the FBS world. They are a joke and now there is no post-season access point even if they could field a capable team. Bowls are aligned with league partnerships, and ESPN owns a good share of them.
Obviously if other leagues are talking about putting together an FCS conference, there are solid reasons for doing so.
Would a NBE FCS league provide good content for the next television talks? Would FS1 broadcast some UConn-Villanova and UConn-Georgetown FCS football games?
With a core of Villanova, Georgetown, Butler, and UConn, how may the conference build up to the required number to sponsor the sport?
Why not build with FB Only affiliates: Fordham, Davidson, Dayton, Valpo, Duquesne, Albany, UNH, URI?
If the NBE can secure television coverage, I'd think FCS could have its benefits.
I'm finding it hard to believe UConn is long for the FBS world. They are a joke and now there is no post-season access point even if they could field a capable team. Bowls are aligned with league partnerships, and ESPN owns a good share of them.
Obviously if other leagues are talking about putting together an FCS conference, there are solid reasons for doing so.
Would a NBE FCS league provide good content for the next television talks? Would FS1 broadcast some UConn-Villanova and UConn-Georgetown FCS football games?
With a core of Villanova, Georgetown, Butler, and UConn, how may the conference build up to the required number to sponsor the sport?
Why not build with FB Only affiliates: Fordham, Davidson, Dayton, Valpo, Duquesne, Albany, UNH, URI?
If the NBE can secure television coverage, I'd think FCS could have its benefits.