kayako wrote:The mistake was underestimating Xavier.
XUFan09 wrote:kayako wrote:The mistake was underestimating Xavier.
Yup!
But seriously, I didn't expect Xavier to go 15-3 in the conference slate. At the same time, I didn't understand how they didn't get more respect after last season. After overcoming the Sumner injury and after Bluiett returned from his own injury, they proceeded to go on a big run and showed what kind of team they would be the following year. The only guys they lost were Malcolm Bernard (one of my favorite all-time seniors but a limited player) and Rashid Gaston (great rebounder and good fundamental defender but had fallen behind Sean O'Mara and Tyrique Jones on the depth chart near the end of the year). In my mind, the guys returning were heads and shoulders above the rest of the Big East except Villanova, and I think that if Phil Booth had been there for the whole conference slate, at worst they would have tied with Xavier for the conference championship.
mel ott wrote:Bias; have always liked Nova better.
ecasadoSBU wrote:He said head and shoulder above the rest, except for Villanova. That's fairly accurate. The Elite8 run difinitely showed it was going to be a beast this year. Glad it panned out just as expected for them. Now go win it all for the Big East!!!
mel ott wrote:XUFan09 wrote:kayako wrote:The mistake was underestimating Xavier.
Yup!
But seriously, I didn't expect Xavier to go 15-3 in the conference slate. At the same time, I didn't understand how they didn't get more respect after last season. After overcoming the Sumner injury and after Bluiett returned from his own injury, they proceeded to go on a big run and showed what kind of team they would be the following year. The only guys they lost were Malcolm Bernard (one of my favorite all-time seniors but a limited player) and Rashid Gaston (great rebounder and good fundamental defender but had fallen behind Sean O'Mara and Tyrique Jones on the depth chart near the end of the year). In my mind, the guys returning were heads and shoulders above the rest of the Big East except Villanova, and I think that if Phil Booth had been there for the whole conference slate, at worst they would have tied with Xavier for the conference championship.
First of all - congrats on the title. You have a great team. However, a little bit of an overstatement- " head and shoulders above the rest"- I don't think so. You should thank Creighton partially for your conference title. Without the almost universally acclaimed bad call at the end of the CU game, you lose that game. Those are just the calls that make a difference in a game I get, but the very last play? Also, if we didn't lose Martin K. we most certainly would have been there at the end of the race. Lastly, we were lucky enough to beat Vill a week later in OT ( a game which could have gone either way). You lose, they win, you could still be #2. Head and shoulders above everyone else, I don't think so. Just take your title with a bit of humility. Hope you and all the Big East teams advance.
Bias; have always liked Nova better.
mel ott wrote:ecasadoSBU wrote:He said head and shoulder above the rest, except for Villanova. That's fairly accurate. The Elite8 run difinitely showed it was going to be a beast this year. Glad it panned out just as expected for them. Now go win it all for the Big East!!!
We understood what he meant. Head and shoulders- did you beat Nova?
XUFan09 wrote:but is there really any debate about the separation other than that?
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests