gtmoBlue wrote:I've been using my left mind for about 30 years now...my right one went on strike during my military years.
Bona (as you say) and StL (SLU) would boost the conferences middle and upper tiered teams into the dance on a more consistent basis.
Instead of 4 or 5 teams, with 6 in a very good year, we'd be seeing 6 or 7 teams dancing annually, with 8 in a very good year.
Just a bit more Dinar in NCAA Credit monies coming into the conference.
JP Schmack is back posting...perhaps he would grace us with spelling out his expansion plan/scenario, again.
Xudash wrote:Allow me to follow-up that post with this one: Xavier just one the regular season Big East Championship.
Doing that dwarfs anything the program ever accomplished in tha A10. A10 fans who read this board can't imagine or will probably refuse to acknowledge and accept the level of competition that exists in the Big East.
BlueDog wrote:gtmoBlue wrote:Get a glimpse of the future, today:
St Bonnies (23-6) @ St Louis (15-14) on Fox Sports Midwest, @8PM tonite.
The Bonnies are rollin'.
Love how rabid the Bona fans are but... In XU's A10 years Bona was an RPI boat anchor most years. They'd occasionally have a good run but most of the time it was brutal. They're also in a hard to reach location. If this game was at Bona the Billikin's bus (yes you need a bus from Buffalo to get there) would probably be sitting in the middle of a snowbank right about now. Most fans who cared about the A10 wanted Bona to leave for a lesser conference. Why anyone in their right mind thinks they'd be a good fit in the BE escapes me.
Xudash wrote:Allow me to follow-up that post with this one: Xavier just won the regular season Big East Championship. Doing that dwarfs anything the program ever accomplished in tha A10. A10 fans who read this board can't imagine or will probably refuse to acknowledge and accept the level of competition that exists in the Big East.
Xudash wrote:I've always liked and respected SBU. A proud program. Passionate fans. BUT, small and isolated is no way to position yourself for a top-2/3 conference.
Xudash wrote:AND your fixation on manufacturing more bids via dilution is absolutely nuts.
IF we expand, it probably happens by adding only one team to protect the round robin as we otherwise move to a 20 game schedule, and it will probably only happen by adding the perceived strongest, most mutually acceptable program available.
Not one A10 team is at the top of such a list presently and SBU - fairly or unfairly - is no where near such a list. Gaming bids is not the emphasis. Protecting the brand through strength is the emphasis.
JPSchmack wrote:Xudash wrote:Allow me to follow-up that post with this one: Xavier just won the regular season Big East Championship. Doing that dwarfs anything the program ever accomplished in tha A10. A10 fans who read this board can't imagine or will probably refuse to acknowledge and accept the level of competition that exists in the Big East.
I agree and am the example of someone who DOES imagine, acknowledges, accepts the level of competition in the Big East. But that’s actually my point….Xudash wrote:I've always liked and respected SBU. A proud program. Passionate fans. BUT, small and isolated is no way to position yourself for a top-2/3 conference.
Gonzaga is small, proud, passionate and isolated.Xudash wrote:AND your fixation on manufacturing more bids via dilution is absolutely nuts.
IF we expand, it probably happens by adding only one team to protect the round robin as we otherwise move to a 20 game schedule, and it will probably only happen by adding the perceived strongest, most mutually acceptable program available.
Not one A10 team is at the top of such a list presently and SBU - fairly or unfairly - is no where near such a list. Gaming bids is not the emphasis. Protecting the brand through strength is the emphasis.
Manufacturing bids is what you do when you don’t have the quality programs and you conspire and schedule to make it appear that you do. The Big East doesn’t have to do that.
The Big East has the strength. It has the brand. You’re viewing expansion from the same stance as the Power Football Conferences: They were trying to fix a weakness. Your only weakness is that you can’t all go to the dance in the same year (More TV viewers doesn’t hurt, either).
If you take 10 shooters that average 20 points per game and make a team out of them, they won’t magically score 200 points per game. Because there’s only one basketball and about 75 possessions.
Four guys are going to see their scoring average go down. By a lot. That’s what’s happened to Marquette, Georgetown, DePaul and St. John’s.
You bring in two role guys who can create extra possessions by grabbing offensive boards, hitting the floor and getting steals… your shooters can score more.
That’s not “manipulation via dilution” that’s being a well rounded and making everyone better.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests