Page 1 of 1

The North Carolina bathroom law gave S. C. home court adv.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:38 pm
by SJU1987
Heard it on The Mike Francesca show. He said they moved the tournament out of North Carolina to South Carolina and it probably cost Duke the game.

Re: The North Carolina bathroom law gave S. C. home court ad

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:46 pm
by xusandy
Well, actually, the play of South Carolina cost Duke the game,and Chapel Hill is about the same distance to Greenville as is Columbia. There were more Duke fans in the stands than SC fans -- at least by fan apparel numbers. But then, all those loving UNC fans who hung around to see the nightcap rooted hard for SC over the team in their own league --by about 9-1 it seemed to me. In the Big East, it would've been about 9-1 FOR the team in our own league.

Re: The North Carolina bathroom law gave S. C. home court ad

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 6:32 pm
by DeltaV
xusandy wrote:Well, actually, the play of South Carolina cost Duke the game,and Chapel Hill is about the same distance to Greenville as is Columbia. There were more Duke fans in the stands than SC fans -- at least by fan apparel numbers. But then, all those loving UNC fans who hung around to see the nightcap rooted hard for SC over the team in their own league --by about 9-1 it seemed to me. In the Big East, it would've been about 9-1 FOR the team in our own league.


I've actually gotten crap or at least confused looks from people I know that I would root for Georgetown in a non-conference game. My parents went to Nova during the heyday of Big 5 doubleheaders, where two Philly teams would play and fans would nearly murder each other, and then another Philly team would play some poor out of town team and the entire Palestra would gang up on them. They taught me to root for the conference because it was good for the conference/Philly, even if it meant rooting for Georgetown or St. Joe's.

Re: The North Carolina bathroom law gave S. C. home court ad

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 6:52 pm
by Michael in Raleigh
xusandy wrote:Well, actually, the play of South Carolina cost Duke the game,and Chapel Hill is about the same distance to Greenville as is Columbia. There were more Duke fans in the stands than SC fans -- at least by fan apparel numbers. But then, all those loving UNC fans who hung around to see the nightcap rooted hard for SC over the team in their own league --by about 9-1 it seemed to me. In the Big East, it would've been about 9-1 FOR the team in our own league.


My parents live in Greenville, SC, where I grew up, and I pass through Chapel Hill on the way to visit them. Chapel Hill is over twice as far from Greenville as is Columbia.

That said, the team beat Duke, not the crowd.

Re: The North Carolina bathroom law gave S. C. home court ad

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 6:55 pm
by MUPanther
Every year Duke and North Carolina play the first two rounds in Greensboro, Raleigh, Winston-Salem or Charlotte. Should anyone really feel sorry for them.

Re: The North Carolina bathroom law gave S. C. home court ad

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:05 pm
by Michael in Raleigh
MUPanther wrote:Every year Duke and North Carolina play the first two rounds in Greensboro, Raleigh, Winston-Salem or Charlotte. Should anyone really feel sorry for them.

No.

Re: The North Carolina bathroom law gave S. C. home court ad

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 8:22 pm
by anXUfan
Michael in Raleigh wrote:
MUPanther wrote:Every year Duke and North Carolina play the first two rounds in Greensboro, Raleigh, Winston-Salem or Charlotte. Should anyone really feel sorry for them.

No.


Totally agree.