Welcome to The Holy Land of Hoops

GoldenWarrior11 wrote:This deal doesn't get done unless Fox also officially (or unofficially) makes concessions for UConn Football to help them schedule as an independent, because they aren't going to C-USA, MAC, MWC, or Sun Belt.

My guess is that Fox is trying to work with the Big 12 and B1G to arrange for some type of scheduling arrangement year-to-year that guarantees UConn play two teams from each conference. That would be four total games accounted for a schedule. Then, UConn would be able to schedule yearly games with Army, UMass and BYU - that gets them to seven games. Finally, you schedule three or four games each year against regional schools to help create regional interest and for recruiting purposes - Syracuse, Boston College, Pittsburgh, Buffalo, Virginia, etc. You could fill it out with one final FCS game against a Villanova, Delaware, James Madison, Richmond, etc.

A schedule like that absolutely does not devalue their football program (an argument can be made that it could even strengthen it). If they get to 6 wins, they are automatically eligible for a bowl game. Maybe Fox even agrees to televise some game(s) to sweeten the deal.

What's the end result? Getting UConn back into the Big East increases an already strong national prestige, entrenches the conference in New York City, increases prestige of basketball conference (which is already really high) and positions the current membership for a potential increase in pay via next TV contract. The other factor to consider is that it likely means we will start averaging six teams into the tournament instead of five. Obviously, UConn wins because it dramatically increases their conference prestige and fan interest with more regional rivals, and gets them properly rewarded for their basketball success.

paulxu wrote:What are the disadvantages of the round robin format? Just curious.

FenwayFriar wrote:Barstool Sports says no to UConn:

http://www.barstoolsports.com/barstoolu/the-big-east-never-needed-uconn-and-they-still-dont-now/

kayako wrote:

paulxu wrote:What are the disadvantages of the round robin format? Just curious.

This is just my opinion:

1. Double round-robin format itself isn't the problem, but having 20 conference games probably isn't ideal for Villanova. Not sure about other teams in the league, but every program has x amount of cupcakes, rpi/buy games, local games, recruiting games, special games, and marquee (for the season ticket holders) games they'd like to play.

2. ACC going to 20 games shouldn't be the reason we follow suit. Should we add 5 teams, too?

3. More conference games = worse overall record. Basically, teams won't be able to pad their records as much as they do now. It doesn't make sense, but we still hear things like "only X number of teams made the tournament with 13 losses."

FenwayFriar wrote:Barstool Sports says no to UConn:

http://www.barstoolsports.com/barstoolu/the-big-east-never-needed-uconn-and-they-still-dont-now/

Xudash wrote:

FenwayFriar wrote:Barstool Sports says no to UConn:

http://www.barstoolsports.com/barstoolu/the-big-east-never-needed-uconn-and-they-still-dont-now/

Anyone bother to read through the comments section?

Damn.

Westbrook#36 wrote:Beware, if UConn does rejoin the BE that's just a small sample of how insufferable their fans can be. College basketball was invented in the early 1990's by St. James Calhoun, the patron saint of thugs and laptop thieves.