Your definition of team and conference tourney success
Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:51 pm
AS the Big East is looking to establish itself as a consistent, national, power basketball conference, I think most can agree that a substantial piece of attaining and maintaining that goal is tournament success. Whether you agree or disagree with a few weeks in March being the proverbial measuring stick of the success of a three and half-month season is inconsequential. The press, recruits, players, and pretty much everyone else who is in any way, shape, or form vested in college basketball, it is the barometer, the ending criterion. I realize it’s all somewhat relative as our teams are in different stages every year, whether it be rebuilding, injury plagued, young, veteran laden, etc., but just looking for a generalized, median view.
To that end, I ask my fellow conference mates the following
1) What do you see as a disappointing/“normal”/and a best-case scenario year, NCAA tournament wise, in regards to bids/how often/ to results for your TEAM of interest?
2) From a CONFERENCE perspective, what do you see as disappointing/ “normal” or routine number of bids per year/a great year? How far and how many teams advancing to what round(s) in the Tournament would be considered disappointing, normal, and exceptional.
For my beloved Musketeers:
As a TEAM: Expect a bid 9 out of 10 years.
-DISAPOINTING: No invite. May lead to clinical depression with spontaneous and public outbursts of sobbing followed by screams of “Why, why hath though done this to me!”
-NORMAL: Tourney invite and round of 32. NORMAL PLUS: if we are considered a pre-season top 25 type squad and reach the Sweet 16. Sprinkling in an Elite 8 every 4-6 years.
EXCEPTIONAL: Elite 8. We could go 0-20, win the conference tourney and the auto bid, advance to the Elite 8, and I would deem the season exceptional. Granted, I may develop a serious case of Bi Polar syndrome, but so worth it. For Xavier fans though, the FINAL FOUR is the next benchmark success in the progression of the program. We’ve been close in the last ten plus years but have yet to successfully negotiate that final hurdle. We get to the final weekend and I may even be somewhat amicable to a red sweater vest wearing Dayton fan. Maybe not. I can only imagine what a ride it must have been for Butler fans going to back to back National Championship games. I'd probably still be three sheets to the wind celebrating that feat.
As a CONFERENCE:
DISAPOINTING: 2-3 teams. Adding insult to injury would be having to read the drivel geared toward “is the Big East a major conference” or the many other reincarnations that would mirror that headline. Trolls from A-10 and Mountain West over running this board, cats and dogs living together, complete anarchy. Results would be no teams reaching the second week.
NORMAL: 4-5 bids. My satisfaction can vary depending on the type of seeding we draw. If we earn 4 bids but three of those bids are top 4 seeds, that’s pretty solid. Results: 3-4 teams to round of 32, 2-3 to Sweet 16, 1-2 to Elite 8, 1 to Final Four.
EXCEPTIONAL: 6 plus bids. Majority with top 5 seeds. 3-4 teams to Sweet 16, 2-3 Elite 8, 1-2 Final Four, 1 National Champion.
Very interested to hear everyone else’s’ opinion.
To that end, I ask my fellow conference mates the following
1) What do you see as a disappointing/“normal”/and a best-case scenario year, NCAA tournament wise, in regards to bids/how often/ to results for your TEAM of interest?
2) From a CONFERENCE perspective, what do you see as disappointing/ “normal” or routine number of bids per year/a great year? How far and how many teams advancing to what round(s) in the Tournament would be considered disappointing, normal, and exceptional.
For my beloved Musketeers:
As a TEAM: Expect a bid 9 out of 10 years.
-DISAPOINTING: No invite. May lead to clinical depression with spontaneous and public outbursts of sobbing followed by screams of “Why, why hath though done this to me!”
-NORMAL: Tourney invite and round of 32. NORMAL PLUS: if we are considered a pre-season top 25 type squad and reach the Sweet 16. Sprinkling in an Elite 8 every 4-6 years.
EXCEPTIONAL: Elite 8. We could go 0-20, win the conference tourney and the auto bid, advance to the Elite 8, and I would deem the season exceptional. Granted, I may develop a serious case of Bi Polar syndrome, but so worth it. For Xavier fans though, the FINAL FOUR is the next benchmark success in the progression of the program. We’ve been close in the last ten plus years but have yet to successfully negotiate that final hurdle. We get to the final weekend and I may even be somewhat amicable to a red sweater vest wearing Dayton fan. Maybe not. I can only imagine what a ride it must have been for Butler fans going to back to back National Championship games. I'd probably still be three sheets to the wind celebrating that feat.
As a CONFERENCE:
DISAPOINTING: 2-3 teams. Adding insult to injury would be having to read the drivel geared toward “is the Big East a major conference” or the many other reincarnations that would mirror that headline. Trolls from A-10 and Mountain West over running this board, cats and dogs living together, complete anarchy. Results would be no teams reaching the second week.
NORMAL: 4-5 bids. My satisfaction can vary depending on the type of seeding we draw. If we earn 4 bids but three of those bids are top 4 seeds, that’s pretty solid. Results: 3-4 teams to round of 32, 2-3 to Sweet 16, 1-2 to Elite 8, 1 to Final Four.
EXCEPTIONAL: 6 plus bids. Majority with top 5 seeds. 3-4 teams to Sweet 16, 2-3 Elite 8, 1-2 Final Four, 1 National Champion.
Very interested to hear everyone else’s’ opinion.