gtmoBlue wrote:Rjay, these previews are fairly in-depth ones thus far.
Would you please add your predicted order of finish, for each team, in the conference for this upcoming season?
It appears that MU only has 11 players on scholie (counting both transfers). Is this accurate?
With no Srs and 3 Jrs on the roster including transfer W. Ellenson, depth will definitely continue to be an issue this season. Only 10 of the 11 scholied players are eligible to play (the newest transfer is sitting out per NCAA rules).
Developing a good team chemistry and having all the newcomers buying in and jelling asap will tell the tale.
That Italy excursion in August will be crucial for the Warriors/GE's. More so than for Creighton and G'twn (also taking trips to Italy in August) as both have more experienced returnees.
Many seem to expect a 1 year turnaround for MU, but such optimism is hollow as it is predicated on Frosh of the Year performances from 2 or more of their incoming class. Given the learning curve for frosh in Div 1, such optimism is not warranted, especially if the players are thrust into the mix on a shorthanded team.
warriorfan4life wrote:Very fair and accurate preview. Marquette is probably the team with the largest potential variance, as I could believe anything from a third to ninth place finish (believe that Nova and Georgetown are the clear 1-2, and Seton Hall is my clear last place team). A healthy Luke Fischer has the potential to be the second best big man in the conference this year behind Nova's Daniel Ochefu, and Duane Wilson flashed game-breaking potential at times last year (almost single handedly won the Tennessee game for us and damn near won us the Georgetown game at home). Are those two players good (moderate step up from last year), very good (in the discussion for All-Big East), or excellent (one or both make the all-conference teams)? After that, it is a question of how good Henry Ellenson will be off the bat (my best guess is a similar level of contribution as Fischer last year) and what can players 4-10 contribute? Early reports on both Traci Carter and Sacar Anim are very favorable, and both will have plenty of opportunities to contribute. I love big guards like Haanif Cheatham, and believe that he will be excellent in time. I like the long-term potential and skills of Sandy Cohen, but he needs to be more comfortable on the court and react naturally (looked like a deer in headlights for much of conference play). Not a fan at all of Jajuan Johnson's game, and am surprised that he is still at Marquette (Wojo would have never recruited him, and he is originally from the South in Memphis). I credit him for sticking it out at Marquette and he slowly started to show signs of fitting into a structured system towards the end of last season. Matt Heldt should be a strong contributor in his upperclassman years, but ideally would redshirt next season. Wally Ellenson could provide nice energy off the bench as a pesky, energy type that will throw down some impressive dunks.
My one regret during this offseason is not landing an immediately eligible frontcourt player, and the team really could have used Cornell grad transfer Shonn Miller (who chose UConn over Marquette). He could have provided needed experience and rebounding ability in the frontcourt, and eliminated some of the negative possibilities for next season. I am cautiously optimistic that Marquette competes for an NCAA bid next year and expect significant improvement off of last year's overall and conference record (at least 3-4 games better overall and 3-4 wins better in conference). Pretty optimistic about the long-term direction of the program under Wojo, and would love to get back where the Marquette program belongs in the NCAA Tournament (and compete for the Big East title a year from now). Really like 2016 commitment Sam Hauser, and believe that Hauser and Rowsey will ensure that Marquette never struggles from deep again under Wojo.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests