Should we get rid of the First Four?

The home for Big East hoops

Should we get rid of the First Four?

Yes
13
59%
No
9
41%
 
Total votes : 22

Re: Should we get rid of the First Four?

Postby stever20 » Wed Mar 18, 2015 8:13 am

there's 32 D1 conferences first off...

of the 32- 19 have been to final 4's.
of the other 13-
Big West- Pacific won games in 04,05
Southland- SF Austin won game last year vs VCU
MAC- several wins
MAAC- Siena had wins in 2008, 09(also in 2002 PIG)
Big Sky-Weber St, Montana with wins last 10-15 years.
Southern- Chattanooga, Charleston with wins
America East- who can forget Vermont?
Summit- North Dakota St last year
Big South- Winthrop
OVC- Murray St and Morehead St
MEAC- Norfolk St in 2012(over #2 Missouri), Coppin St in 1997(over #2 South Carolina), Hampton(over #2 Iowa St)
SWAC- Southern U in 93 beat Georgia Tech

really the only conference who has never had a team in the round of 32 is the Northeast Conference.
stever20
 
Posts: 13457
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:43 pm

Re: Should we get rid of the First Four?

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Should we get rid of the First Four?

Postby shupirate98 » Wed Mar 18, 2015 10:21 am

stever20 wrote:The AQ is never going to go away. NEVER. What I do think happens is the P5 will make it where the PIG is 4 16 vs 16 games, which does improve things a bit.

That will never happen. That's actually what the NCAA first wanted to do but their TV partner said no way. And when the TV partner is paying you a billion dollars the TV partner gets what it wants. They don't want 4 MEAC vs. SWAC type games. Who the hell's watching that?
shupirate98
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:02 am

Re: Should we get rid of the First Four?

Postby stever20 » Wed Mar 18, 2015 10:44 am

shupirate98 wrote:
stever20 wrote:The AQ is never going to go away. NEVER. What I do think happens is the P5 will make it where the PIG is 4 16 vs 16 games, which does improve things a bit.

That will never happen. That's actually what the NCAA first wanted to do but their TV partner said no way. And when the TV partner is paying you a billion dollars the TV partner gets what it wants. They don't want 4 MEAC vs. SWAC type games. Who the hell's watching that?

I think the P5 will make a harder push for this concept this year.
stever20
 
Posts: 13457
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:43 pm

Re: Should we get rid of the First Four?

Postby DudeAnon » Wed Mar 18, 2015 11:05 am

stever20 wrote:there's 32 D1 conferences first off...

of the 32- 19 have been to final 4's.
of the other 13-
Big West- Pacific won games in 04,05
Southland- SF Austin won game last year vs VCU
MAC- several wins
MAAC- Siena had wins in 2008, 09(also in 2002 PIG)
Big Sky-Weber St, Montana with wins last 10-15 years.
Southern- Chattanooga, Charleston with wins
America East- who can forget Vermont?
Summit- North Dakota St last year
Big South- Winthrop
OVC- Murray St and Morehead St
MEAC- Norfolk St in 2012(over #2 Missouri), Coppin St in 1997(over #2 South Carolina), Hampton(over #2 Iowa St)
SWAC- Southern U in 93 beat Georgia Tech

really the only conference who has never had a team in the round of 32 is the Northeast Conference.


Yea, that doesn't change my opinion at all. D1 needs to contract and get rid of the bottom 10 conferences.
Xavier

2018 Big East Champs
User avatar
DudeAnon
 
Posts: 3004
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:52 pm

Re: Should we get rid of the First Four?

Postby stever20 » Wed Mar 18, 2015 11:16 am

DudeAnon wrote:
stever20 wrote:there's 32 D1 conferences first off...

of the 32- 19 have been to final 4's.
of the other 13-
Big West- Pacific won games in 04,05
Southland- SF Austin won game last year vs VCU
MAC- several wins
MAAC- Siena had wins in 2008, 09(also in 2002 PIG)
Big Sky-Weber St, Montana with wins last 10-15 years.
Southern- Chattanooga, Charleston with wins
America East- who can forget Vermont?
Summit- North Dakota St last year
Big South- Winthrop
OVC- Murray St and Morehead St
MEAC- Norfolk St in 2012(over #2 Missouri), Coppin St in 1997(over #2 South Carolina), Hampton(over #2 Iowa St)
SWAC- Southern U in 93 beat Georgia Tech

really the only conference who has never had a team in the round of 32 is the Northeast Conference.


Yea, that doesn't change my opinion at all. D1 needs to contract and get rid of the bottom 10 conferences.

I agree- but just do not see it happening.

What I wish D1 was-
The F5, G5(so 10 conferences there- ACC, B10, B12, P12, SEC, AAC, CUSA, MAC, SBC, and MWC)
BE
A10
MVC
WCC

that's 14 right there. Every at large was in that group. Then add in 8 others- probably Horizon, Ivy, CAA, Southern, Big Sky, MAAC, OVC, Southland.

Get rid of-
America East
Atlantic Sun
Big South
Big West
MEAC
NEC
Patriot
SWAC
Summit
WAC

would get rid of 97 teams leaving 254 schools.
stever20
 
Posts: 13457
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:43 pm

Re: Should we get rid of the First Four?

Postby shupirate98 » Wed Mar 18, 2015 11:26 am

stever20 wrote:
shupirate98 wrote:
stever20 wrote:The AQ is never going to go away. NEVER. What I do think happens is the P5 will make it where the PIG is 4 16 vs 16 games, which does improve things a bit.

That will never happen. That's actually what the NCAA first wanted to do but their TV partner said no way. And when the TV partner is paying you a billion dollars the TV partner gets what it wants. They don't want 4 MEAC vs. SWAC type games. Who the hell's watching that?

I think the P5 will make a harder push for this concept this year.

They can push for whatever they want. CBS/Turner has a contract.
shupirate98
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:02 am

Re: Should we get rid of the First Four?

Postby stever20 » Wed Mar 18, 2015 11:33 am

I'd be pretty certain the contract doesn't mandate that the 4 games have to have 2 games with at large teams. It wasn't announced as such when the tv deal was announced.
stever20
 
Posts: 13457
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:43 pm

Re: Should we get rid of the First Four?

Postby hoyahooligan » Wed Mar 18, 2015 3:32 pm

I think they just need to get rid of the play in games all together.

Barring that, It would be nice to move them earlier so there's a week off between them and the games, this would reduce the advantage these 11 seeds currently have and give the 6 seeds adequate time to plan. But that of course would leave such a huge time off for the other teams. Although I guess it's no different than the super bowl, so it could be done.

I like the small conferences getting to play with the big boys even though it's bitten my team in the ass on numerous occasions as of late. I wouldn't want to see them 1) all being forced to play in the play in games or 2) not invited to the tournament at all.
hoyahooligan
 
Posts: 1488
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2013 6:43 pm

Re: Should we get rid of the First Four?

Postby stever20 » Wed Mar 18, 2015 9:01 pm

I think if I'm Providence I'm hoping I see Dayton on Friday instead of Boise. Boise looks really good.

And they made a great point about the supposed home court advantage of Dayton. The biggest part of home court advantage is maybe getting a few extra whistles that you wouldn't get neutral or road games. Well with the NCAA tourney, that aspect of things is totally mitigated.
stever20
 
Posts: 13457
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:43 pm

Re: Should we get rid of the First Four?

Postby Omaha1 » Wed Mar 18, 2015 10:46 pm

The first 4 is fine, but you can't have a team play on it's home court. Rotate the site or something but never allow that to happen again because the better team lost due to a bad decision by the NCAA.
Nebraska by birth, Creighton by choice.
Omaha1
 
Posts: 3268
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2013 9:27 am

PreviousNext

Return to Big East basketball message board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 30 guests