stever20 wrote:GumbyDamnit! wrote:stever20 wrote:Sorry but Xavier just isn't a guarantee yet. They need 1 more win just like St John's does. 18-14 gets them up to a 62 RPI with 14 losses. That combo doesn't get you in the tourney ever.
you say what difference does 1 win make?
losing out:
own record 14.4-12 .545 62.3 projected RPI
just 1 win at Creighton:
own record: 15-8-11.4 .581 51.3 projected RPI
There goes Stever moving the goal posts again. I recall a statement form Stever in which he said: "like it or not RPI is still a significant part of the selection process." Well Stever here you go:
Xavier = 30
St. john's = 31
Mich St = 32
Temple = 33
Indiana = 35
Ohio St = 39
Tulsa = 41
Cincy = 54 (What!!???)
- Remember when I said that the AAC could potentially send only 2 teams to the tourney? If Tulsa, Temple or Cincy slip up...uh, oh!
BTW, your other tourney teams from 2 weeks ago:
UCONN = 75
FL = 89
Dude I haven't moved the goalposts 1 bit. I said weeks ago Xavier at 18-14 probably doesn't get in. You add 3 losses to any teams resume and you are going to see the RPI plummet. Especially when 1 is a home loss and another is vs one of the bottom 2 positions. If Xavier is 18-14, they will not have a 30 RPI. I'll ban myself from the site if they do have a 30 RPI.
And once again- the tourney selection isn't based on Feb 26. It's based on March 15. Xavier is not a lock by any measure.
Yes, Steve, you are moving the goal posts:
Goal Post #1 - "like it or not, RPI is still a significant part of the selection process."
Even if the lose their last 3 games, Xavier projected RPI IS 48, good enough to put just about any team in. But when Xavier meets Goal Post #1, you introduce:
Goal Post #2 - "Regardless of the RPI, the committee will never give a bid to an 18-14 team."