SJHooper wrote:I can't see SHU being better than: SJ, Xavier, Nova, G'Town, Marquette, or PC. History will show you that starting with lots of rookies (unless they are top 5 can't miss UK type players) usually does not equal success.
By the way, Lindy's magazine picked us to finish 2nd. So it's not just me being a homer calling people biased against SJ who pick them 6th or 7th. From 2nd to 6-7 is a big jump.
muskienick wrote:SJHooper wrote:I can't see SHU being better than: SJ, Xavier, Nova, G'Town, Marquette, or PC. History will show you that starting with lots of rookies (unless they are top 5 can't miss UK type players) usually does not equal success.
By the way, Lindy's magazine picked us to finish 2nd. So it's not just me being a homer calling people biased against SJ who pick them 6th or 7th. From 2nd to 6-7 is a big jump.
Lindy's or not, this poll has now been made a choice between SHU and SJU for one place in the standings. In that match-up alone, I'll take SHU. I honestly don't see any large gap in the depth or talent levels between the two teams, but I do see such a gap in the quality of the head coaches and that is the basis for me for choosing SHU for 6th place.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests