xavierfano8 wrote:I went with Marquette simply because they lack a post presence. I like the guard play especially with adding Carlino, but the have a lot of undersized forwards. Burton can hold his own as my Muskies know, but fouls trouble could be an issue. I think they'll need Fischer to be ready to go right when he becomes eligible in December.
R to the OB wrote:For me, it's Butler. They just don't have enough in the post - enough size. They will have good guard play, but I see them getting outscored, out rebounded and worn out inside as the season progresses. I think they are still a year away.
Irishdawg wrote:R to the OB wrote:For me, it's Butler. They just don't have enough in the post - enough size. They will have good guard play, but I see them getting outscored, out rebounded and worn out inside as the season progresses. I think they are still a year away.
The question is, if they don't finish any better than 9th in the league this season, what are they a year away from? I actually think their front court depth will be a strength for this team (though none of the players except maybe Chrabascz will score a ton, IMO). Granted, their front court is young with 1 senior, 2 freshman and a sophomore, but really other than Woods, they all at least look like Big East players, and honestly I had a tough time saying that about anyone other than maybe Barlow and Chrabascz last season. Same on the wing with Jones, Martin and Etherington (if he can stay healthy). Real question to me is actually the health of Dunham and Barlow. Either one of those guys goes down, there is no one to back them up. Both will need to play Bryce Cotton type minutes this year, and I think if anyone has the potential of getting worn down and beat up from the season for Butler (aside from any freshman "wall" that you sometimes see), it's those two.
I like them getting picked 9th though, they should be plenty motivated after last year, but this certainly can't hurt. Doesn't mean I think they can't finish 9th, but really after Villanova, anything can happen this season.
R to the OB wrote:For me, it's Butler. They just don't have enough in the post - enough size. They will have good guard play, but I see them getting outscored, out rebounded and worn out inside as the season progresses. I think they are still a year away.
hoyahooligan wrote:R to the OB wrote:For me, it's Butler. They just don't have enough in the post - enough size. They will have good guard play, but I see them getting outscored, out rebounded and worn out inside as the season progresses. I think they are still a year away.
You can say the same thing of Marquette. They'll have Fischer by BE season but besides that they have 6'7" Taylor and 6'4" Burton and that's it.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 48 guests