FaN78 wrote:Nice article. Compare it to this piece of junk from the Philly paper:
http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/colleges/20140312_Big_East_tournament_not_what_it_used_to_be.html
On the bright side, Jay said:stever20 wrote:FaN78 wrote:Nice article. Compare it to this piece of junk from the Philly paper:
http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/colleges/20140312_Big_East_tournament_not_what_it_used_to_be.html
A lot of the bad things in the story are straight from Jay Wright:
"I think this is an off-year for our league," said Jay Wright, whose Villanova team finished the regular season ranked No. 3 in the nation. "If this was a conference that had been in existence for 20 years, I think you'd say, 'Ah, it's just a down year, but it'll be back.' "
"It's not going to be the same, because Connecticut and Syracuse were such a big part of it," Wright said. "The other teams you miss basketball-wise, but those two schools were a big part of what that tournament is all about. There was just an aura because those two schools were close to New York and their fans would stay. It will not be the same, but it will still be one of the best basketball experiences in the country. People in New York go to this thing every year, and it's basketball. It's the mecca of basketball."
And this part you can't really disagree with:
The catch-22 for schools that hope to gain national attention and rise in the rankings and RPI during the season is that it is nearly impossible during the conference schedule unless there are several highly rated teams in the league. Otherwise, the gains have to be made during the early, nonconference schedule or probably not at all.
this year has been pretty much exactly that in a nutshell....
stever20 wrote:bottom line, the Philly article is pretty fair. Wright said a lot of the things that I have a feeling you were saying was junk.
milwaukeejedi1 wrote:stever20 wrote:bottom line, the Philly article is pretty fair. Wright said a lot of the things that I have a feeling you were saying was junk.
If you compare the headlines, I can see why FaN78 might see a problem with the Philly article (and call it junk). A headline, for some, sets the tone for an article. The first one gives the reader a sense that while the BEast tourney isn't the same, it has the potential to become what it was when UConn, Cuse, and the rest were members of the conference. The other headline sets the opposite tone.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 21 guests