butlerway wrote:http://holylandofhoops.net/holy-land-of-hoops-thanksgiving-power-rankings/
And yes, the Creighton logo is updated now
TheHall wrote:butlerway wrote:http://holylandofhoops.net/holy-land-of-hoops-thanksgiving-power-rankings/
And yes, the Creighton logo is updated now
So SHU easily handles a Monmouth team that SJU struggled with later, loses a game we mostly dominated by 1 against a good OU team, and then bounce back the next day and beat VT, yet no movement in the rankings. Preseason bias maybe?
admin wrote:TheHall wrote:butlerway wrote:http://holylandofhoops.net/holy-land-of-hoops-thanksgiving-power-rankings/
And yes, the Creighton logo is updated now
So SHU easily handles a Monmouth team that SJU struggled with later, loses a game we mostly dominated by 1 against a good OU team, and then bounce back the next day and beat VT, yet no movement in the rankings. Preseason bias maybe?
Who are you going to move down? That's the problem and it's a good problem to have - too many good teams (or so it seems).
TheHall wrote:butlerway wrote:http://holylandofhoops.net/holy-land-of-hoops-thanksgiving-power-rankings/
And yes, the Creighton logo is updated now
So SHU easily handles a Monmouth team that SJU struggled with later, loses a game we mostly dominated by 1 against a good OU team, and then bounce back the next day and beat VT, yet no movement in the rankings. Preseason bias maybe?
TheHall wrote:I'm not knocking SJU or BU. I'm just trying to address the fact that polls usually move based on how they originally assumed to be before even one game was played. (preseason bias). Also when you say "SHU is 4-2...." you miss the whole point of why this is a weekly power ranking.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 56 guests