ChestRockwell85 wrote:VCU, Wichita State, etc. just don't scream Big East to me.
Husky_U wrote:UCONN's best players are all Freshmen and Sophomores. Again, the sooner we wash off the Ollie stank (ie get rid of his recruits), the better.
Bogg wrote:ChestRockwell85 wrote:VCU, Wichita State, etc. just don't scream Big East to me.
My single biggest issue with VCU is that Virginia is solidly ACC-land and VCU is a definite little brother in-state to UVA/VT.
Agreed on Saint Louis as the potential (though possibly perpetual) Next School Up. The school, the facilities, etc have all been discussed. However, as not only a geographic border city on the fringes of the current Big East footprint while State U is a couple hour drive away, but also a border city between conferences where Illinois is in the B1G while Missouri is in the SEC but still has something of a leftover Big 12 vibe about then, they probably have the best chance out of the usual suspects to carve out their own identity without living in State U's shadow.
“the greatest sports deal of all time.” With help from their lawyer, Donald Schupak, the Silnas had, since 1976, received a portion of the NBA’s television rights fees which added up to an estimated $300 million. The NBA has long wanted to somehow end the Silnas sweet deal. And it looks like, with an upfront payment of a cool $500 million or so, the NBA will finally get its wish.
gtmoBlue wrote:St Louis is a pro sports town. They still have the baseball Cardinals and the hockey Blues. Sure, no football Cards nor Rams. No basketball Hawks - although the team owners still get paid by the NBA. College sports is an afterthought- led by Illinois, Mizzou, then the rest...Ill St, Mizzou St, SIU, SIUE, da Billikens, etc. SLU will never get decent market share.
It is wishful thinking to hope they will.
gtmoBlue wrote:St Louis is a pro sports town. They still have the baseball Cardinals and the hockey Blues. Sure, no football Cards nor Rams. No basketball Hawks - although the team owners still get paid by the NBA. College sports is an afterthought- led by Illinois, Mizzou, then the rest...Ill St, Mizzou St, SIU, SIUE, da Billikens, etc. SLU will never get decent market share.
It is wishful thinking to hope they will.
Bogg wrote:gtmoBlue wrote:St Louis is a pro sports town. They still have the baseball Cardinals and the hockey Blues. Sure, no football Cards nor Rams. No basketball Hawks - although the team owners still get paid by the NBA. College sports is an afterthought- led by Illinois, Mizzou, then the rest...Ill St, Mizzou St, SIU, SIUE, da Billikens, etc. SLU will never get decent market share.
It is wishful thinking to hope they will.
Eh, last year Saint Louis did a little under 7k a night against an A-10 schedule. I don't think it's a stretch to say that with a high major bump they'd be doing 8-9k a night and be a pretty standard Big East crowd.
Hall2012 wrote:gtmoBlue wrote:St Louis is a pro sports town. They still have the baseball Cardinals and the hockey Blues. Sure, no football Cards nor Rams. No basketball Hawks - although the team owners still get paid by the NBA. College sports is an afterthought- led by Illinois, Mizzou, then the rest...Ill St, Mizzou St, SIU, SIUE, da Billikens, etc. SLU will never get decent market share.
It is wishful thinking to hope they will.
I disagree. Braggin Rights draws well every year, the SEC Tournament did well there as do NCAA events (basketball and they've hosted wrestling quite a bit). Arch Madness does well enough to keep the Valley going back every year, though losing CU and WSU has hurt it. Every school you mentioned is at least 2 hours from St. Louis except SLU and SIUe, plus they're mostly mid or low majors. Why would any of them be anything other than an afterthought? Would the Jays get much market share in Omaha if CU was 2+ hours away? And still playing in the Valley?
I'd bet that Big East hoops in downtown St. Louis would draw.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 29 guests