Conference Realignment Thread v. 2016

The home for Big East hoops

Re: Conference realignment thread v. 2016

Postby Bill Marsh » Thu Mar 31, 2016 10:41 am

IMO the only reason to expand from 10, which is a great number, is to raise the profile of the conference. (No matter how good it is, any conference can always get better.) Any addition would have to be a Home Run. The value would be in adding games that are "must see" TV. Average team rating is less important than creating high profile match ups.

I see little likelihood that any P5 program or even any P5 aspirant will drop football any time soon. If true,then the only program which has proven that it can compete at this level, that has achieved a #1 ranking recently, that goes to the tournament every year, whose coach isn't going anywhere for a long time to come, and who is an institutional fit is Gonzaga. GU is on the record as saying that it would love to be part of the BE. If they are ready willing and able to take on the travel that would be involved, I don't see why any current BE would object to one long road game a year - maybe less - even for minor sports.

Let the debates ensue about whether travel makes this a non-starter. For the record, the problems are greatly exaggerated for anyone but GU itself.
Bill Marsh
 
Posts: 4239
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:43 am

Re: Conference realignment thread v. 2016

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Conference realignment thread v. 2016

Postby _lh » Thu Mar 31, 2016 12:25 pm

Bill Marsh wrote:IMO the only reason to expand from 10, which is a great number, is to raise the profile of the conference. (No matter how good it is, any conference can always get better.) Any addition would have to be a Home Run. The value would be in adding games that are "must see" TV. Average team rating is less important than creating high profile match ups.

I see little likelihood that any P5 program or even any P5 aspirant will drop football any time soon. If true,then the only program which has proven that it can compete at this level, that has achieved a #1 ranking recently, that goes to the tournament every year, whose coach isn't going anywhere for a long time to come, and who is an institutional fit is Gonzaga. GU is on the record as saying that it would love to be part of the BE. If they are ready willing and able to take on the travel that would be involved, I don't see why any current BE would object to one long road game a year - maybe less - even for minor sports.

Let the debates ensue about whether travel makes this a non-starter. For the record, the problems are greatly exaggerated for anyone but GU itself.


Even if Gonzaga made sense logistically, they are overrated. I don't see them as a necessary addition and certainly not worth the problems to add a program we don't need.

UCONN and ND are the only two that will ever make sense. Both are of course long shots and would only be available under strange circumstances. Stay at 10 or add either one of these two if given the chance.
Xavier
_lh
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 7:50 am

Re: Conference realignment thread v. 2016

Postby TrueBlueJay » Thu Mar 31, 2016 12:34 pm

I know there is a lot of history for UCONN, but I don't get the conversation around them. Are they dropping football? No or Yes. That is the answer to your question about UCONN being in the BE. I think we all know the answer is - No.
User avatar
TrueBlueJay
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 10:02 pm

Re: Conference realignment thread v. 2016

Postby Bill Marsh » Thu Mar 31, 2016 4:11 pm

_lh wrote:
Bill Marsh wrote:IMO the only reason to expand from 10, which is a great number, is to raise the profile of the conference. (No matter how good it is, any conference can always get better.) Any addition would have to be a Home Run. The value would be in adding games that are "must see" TV. Average team rating is less important than creating high profile match ups.

I see little likelihood that any P5 program or even any P5 aspirant will drop football any time soon. If true,then the only program which has proven that it can compete at this level, that has achieved a #1 ranking recently, that goes to the tournament every year, whose coach isn't going anywhere for a long time to come, and who is an institutional fit is Gonzaga. GU is on the record as saying that it would love to be part of the BE. If they are ready willing and able to take on the travel that would be involved, I don't see why any current BE would object to one long road game a year - maybe less - even for minor sports.

Let the debates ensue about whether travel makes this a non-starter. For the record, the problems are greatly exaggerated for anyone but GU itself.


Even if Gonzaga made sense logistically, they are overrated. I don't see them as a necessary addition and certainly not worth the problems to add a program we don't need.

UCONN and ND are the only two that will ever make sense. Both are of course long shots and would only be available under strange circumstances. Stay at 10 or add either one of these two if given the chance.


UConn and ND are never happening. Never. So, you're saying "no" to expansion. That's fine.

If the conference, however, decides to pursue expansion, Gonzaga is as good a fit as nylons will find.

- 18 consecutive tournaments
- multiple Elite 8's and Sweet 16's
- perennially ranked and has been as high as #1
- bringing in the best recruiting class in school history next year
- plays in a sold out home area every game and has a bigger arena available

You don't have to agree with how highly they've been rated, but their stature in the sport is undeniable. They are in fact a household name in college basketball.

Travel is what's overrated. Once a year a BE school would have to take a trip in each of the required sports. Simply substitute it for another elective long road trip. If it's paired with a trip to Creighton, all you've added is the return trip from Spokane for an East Coast school since the flight to Spokane from Omaha is the same length as the return flight from Omaha that the traveling team would have taken anyway.

Adding Gonzaga is a travel problem for Gonzaga, a problem which they'd happily accept. The notion that it would be a problem for anyone else is an argument that's hard for me to buy.
Bill Marsh
 
Posts: 4239
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:43 am

Re: Conference realignment thread v. 2016

Postby whiteandblue77 » Thu Mar 31, 2016 5:14 pm

Image
Cleric: "O Lord, bless this thy BigEast, that with it thou mayst blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy." And the Lord did grin. And the people did feast upon the lambs, and sloths, and carp, and anchovies, and orangutans, and breakfast cereals, and fruit bats, and large chu...
Brother Maynard: Skip a bit, Brother...
Cleric: And the Lord spake, saying, "First shalt thou make a Holy Conference. Then shalt thou count to TEN, no more, no less. TEN shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be TEN. ELEVEN shalt thou not count, neither count thou NINE, excepting that thou then proceed to TEN. TWELVE is right out. Once the number TEN, being the TENTH number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Basketball Conference of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in My sight, shall be snuffed.
The Big East is Dead! Long Live the Big East!
User avatar
whiteandblue77
 
Posts: 651
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:21 pm

Re: Conference realignment thread v. 2016

Postby _lh » Thu Mar 31, 2016 6:16 pm

I said both UCONN and ND are long shots but they are the only two that makes sense. If not them, stay at 10. Gonzaga is overrated and too far. It makes no sense and will never happen.
Xavier
_lh
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 7:50 am

Re: Conference realignment thread v. 2016

Postby Bill Marsh » Thu Mar 31, 2016 6:49 pm

_lh wrote:I said both UCONN and ND are long shots but they are the only two that makes sense. If not them, stay at 10. Gonzaga is overrated and too far. It makes no sense and will never happen.


Why are they too far? I say they're not.

UConn and ND are not long shots. They will never happen.

I like 10, but if Fox says they want more content, who do you add?
Bill Marsh
 
Posts: 4239
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:43 am

Re: Conference realignment thread v. 2016

Postby _lh » Thu Mar 31, 2016 6:58 pm

Bill Marsh wrote:
_lh wrote:I said both UCONN and ND are long shots but they are the only two that makes sense. If not them, stay at 10. Gonzaga is overrated and too far. It makes no sense and will never happen.


Why are they too far? I say they're not.

UConn and ND are not long shots. They will never happen.

I like 10, but if Fox says they want more content, who do you add?


Either will Gonzaga because they are too far. If they were closer like Creighton, they would have been added over Creighton. UCONN is more realistic at this point.
Xavier
_lh
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 7:50 am

Re: Conference realignment thread v. 2016

Postby Bill Marsh » Thu Mar 31, 2016 9:39 pm

_lh wrote:
Bill Marsh wrote:
_lh wrote:I said both UCONN and ND are long shots but they are the only two that makes sense. If not them, stay at 10. Gonzaga is overrated and too far. It makes no sense and will never happen.


Why are they too far? I say they're not.

UConn and ND are not long shots. They will never happen.

I like 10, but if Fox says they want more content, who do you add?


Either will Gonzaga because they are too far. If they were closer like Creighton, they would have been added over Creighton. UCONN is more realistic at this point.


If it's too far, why did 70% of the league schedule trips just as far - or even farther in some cases - this year alone?
Last edited by Bill Marsh on Fri Apr 01, 2016 8:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Bill Marsh
 
Posts: 4239
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:43 am

Re: Conference realignment thread v. 2016

Postby _lh » Fri Apr 01, 2016 8:17 am

If it wasn't too far they would already be in the BE.

Gonzaga is never going to happen. The only two that make any sense to add (even if they are both extreme longshots) are UCONN and ND.
Xavier
_lh
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 7:50 am

PreviousNext

Return to Big East basketball message board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 11 guests