Page 7 of 8
Re: NCAA: Bracket, Schedule, and Non-Big East Games
Posted:
Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:25 pmby kayako
ecasadoSBU wrote:You know they set up Nova with a very difficult path to the F4 for a reason right....
They wanted DUKE not Villanova at MSG... But it backfired.
Not sure I get what you're saying... Most thought Duke was the most difficult #2 seeded team, yet they got paired up with Nova @ MSG. Wisconsin is a separate issue. I hope it's South Carolina vs Florida
Re: NCAA: Bracket, Schedule, and Non-Big East Games
Posted:
Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:27 pmby ecasadoSBU
Boy... that MSG regional is gonna suck. A bunch of southern teams and a Midwest team. Ouch.
Baylor
South Carolina
Wisconsin
Florida
Re: NCAA: Bracket, Schedule, and Non-Big East Games
Posted:
Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:30 pmby bobpp1
And down goes the ACC. Hey Dickie V baby where are all the ACC hacks now with only one to the sweet sixteen with the help of the zebras today.
Re: NCAA: Bracket, Schedule, and Non-Big East Games
Posted:
Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:31 pmby ecasadoSBU
kayako wrote:ecasadoSBU wrote:You know they set up Nova with a very difficult path to the F4 for a reason right....
They wanted DUKE not Villanova at MSG... But it backfired.
Not sure I get what you're saying... Most thought Duke was the most difficult #2 seeded team, yet they got paired up with Nova @ MSG. Wisconsin is a separate issue. I hope it's South Carolina vs Florida
I considered Duke the top #2 seed. So why would they set them in the East in the same bracket as the top #1 seed. Should the worst #2 seed go to the East? Was the NCAA hoping that Villanova was going to fall early, and Duke would have an easier path to MSG? Why would Villanova get Wisconsin? Wisconsin has been a tough team for the past few years, everyone knows Wiscy was underseeded.
Re: NCAA: Bracket, Schedule, and Non-Big East Games
Posted:
Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:32 pmby kayako
Looks like Cinci's about to go home. If UCLA holds on to win, Gonzaga is the lone mid-major team in the Sweet 16, and they've been extremely lucky.
Re: NCAA: Bracket, Schedule, and Non-Big East Games
Posted:
Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:34 pmby kayako
ecasadoSBU wrote:I considered Duke the top #2 seed. So why would they set them in the East in the same bracket as the top #1 seed. Should the worst #2 seed go to the East? Was the NCAA hoping that Villanova was going to fall early, and Duke would have an easier path to MSG? Why would Villanova get Wisconsin? Wisconsin has been a tough team for the past few years, everyone knows Wiscy was underseeded.
I think you have the sites mixed up. MSG is the site for the next 2 rounds. Duke didn't need Nova to lose to reach MSG. They were set to meet in an elite 8 matchup.
I agree with you about Wisconsin, but it's in the past.
Re: NCAA: Bracket, Schedule, and Non-Big East Games
Posted:
Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:43 pmby Toronto Rapture
A North Carolina loss would have been icing on the cake, but I'll take 2 out of 3.
Maybe ESPN can focus on how all but one ACC team loss their second round match.
Re: NCAA: Bracket, Schedule, and Non-Big East Games
Posted:
Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:45 pmby sju88grad
The conference breakdown for the Sweet Sixteen:
PAC 12 - 3 teams (Arizona, UCLA, Oregon)
SEC - 3 teams (Kentucky, Florida, South Carolina)
Big 10 - 3 teams (Michigan, Wisconsin, PUrdue)
Big 12 - 3 teams (Kansas, Baylor, West Virginia)
Big East - 2 teams (Xavier, Butler)
WCC - 1 team (Gonzaga)
ACC - 1 team (UNC)
Can't wait to see how the shills at ESPN try to spin this one.....could not be happier with the ACC implosion.....
One side note - PAC 12 and Big 12 could tie the Big East with 3 Final Four teams.....can't have that happen!!.....SEC and Big 10 are only alive in 2 regions....
Re: NCAA: Bracket, Schedule, and Non-Big East Games
Posted:
Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:51 pmby kayako
What's really regrettable is that BE has been generally unlucky being 0-3 in nail biters and major season-altering injuries. Not an excuse, but we were probably very close to having 4 or 5 teams in the Sweet 16 than most realize.
We got this next year...
Re: NCAA: Bracket, Schedule, and Non-Big East Games
Posted:
Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:07 amby Fieldhouse Flyer
The Best and Worst of the NCAA Tournament's Opening Week - Jeff Eisenberg, The Dagger - March 20, 2017
CONFERENCE THAT GOT EXPOSED
Nine ACC teams received NCAA tournament bids. Six were awarded top-five seeds. Somehow, someway, only North Carolina managed to survive the opening weekend. Duke, Louisville, Florida State, Notre Dame, and Virginia crashed out of the NCAA tournament in the second round. The Tar Heels nearly joined that list of vanquished ACC powers before rallying from a late deficit to defeat Arkansas on Sunday. This year’s March flop doesn’t prove the ACC was overrated, just like last year’s six Sweet 16 bids don’t prove it was among the greatest leagues ever. The only sweeping conclusion that can be made from such a small sample size is that in this year’s NCAA tournament, the ACC was a colossal bust.
MOST SURPRISING SWEET 16 TEAM
In a year in which 15 Sweet 16 teams hail from power conferences and the 16th is powerful Gonzaga, Cinderella has long since packed up her glass slippers and gone home. The only double-digit seed left is a Xavier team making its seventh Sweet 16 appearance since 2004. What makes the Musketeers a surprise is that they entered the NCAA tournament with a 6-7 record since losing star point guard Edmond Sumner to a season-ending knee injury. To win without Sumner, Xavier has since found it must play solid defense, dominate the glass at both ends and have Trevon Bluiett carry them offensively for stretches.
Congratulations to Chris Mack and the Musketeers.