Jet915 wrote:NYT article on Big East.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/17/sports/ncaabasketball/odd-bedfellows-in-realigned-big-east-conference-bond-over-basketball.html?_r=0
Jet915 wrote:NYT article on Big East.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/17/sports/ncaabasketball/odd-bedfellows-in-realigned-big-east-conference-bond-over-basketball.html?_r=0
TheHall wrote:JOPO wrote:marquette wrote:I'm not surprised that there is more enthusiasm among Big East fans than AAC fans. We got 3 great schools that are excellent in basketball, strong in soccer, institutionally similar, and academically strong. The AAC is getting a hodgepodge of whoever would come with no real strong programs outside of Memphis and Temple. Media day should be fun.
This is because the Big East remains big time whereas the AAC is the new name for Conference USA, which is a mid-major. Maybe it's just me, but I really hate seeing the Big East and AAC constantly mentioned in the same sentences. The Big East needs to remain in conversations that include the power five football conferences as the only difference between us and them is the fact that they sponsor football and we do not.
Hey JOPO, marquette got the original post confused it was the ACC not the AAC that was mentioned...lol.
JOPO wrote:TheHall wrote:Hey JOPO, marquette got the original post confused it was the ACC not the AAC that was mentioned...lol.
But Memphis and Temple are in CUSA 2.0 not the ACC, unless marquette just had a total brain spasm on the whole thing. Thing is there will be a lot of comparisons this year with the Big East and years gone by. When comparisons are made to other conferences though, I just want to make sure we are being compared to our peers and not dragged down to a lower level.
TheHall wrote:JOPO wrote:TheHall wrote:Hey JOPO, marquette got the original post confused it was the ACC not the AAC that was mentioned...lol.
But Memphis and Temple are in CUSA 2.0 not the ACC, unless marquette just had a total brain spasm on the whole thing. Thing is there will be a lot of comparisons this year with the Big East and years gone by. When comparisons are made to other conferences though, I just want to make sure we are being compared to our peers and not dragged down to a lower level.
He kinda did...but he caught it later check the thread.
Bill Marsh wrote:Taking in all of the pageantry associated with Media Day got me to thinking about the only other time that the Big East teams all come together under one roof - the Big East Tournament.
Last year the tournament averaged 20,000 attendance per session. Contrast that with the Atlantic Ten tournament , which averaged 6,000 per session across the river at the Barclay Center. That's the conference from which 2 of the 3 new members will be coming. Creighton is used to bigger numbers than that at its conference tournament, which averaged 14,000 last year.
Will the new Big East be able to sell out the Garden as the old version did? Will the tournament be a happening?
If they don't sell out, expansion will be coming sooner rather than later in order to sell more tickets. That thought makes me realize why Dayton is still in the running for an expansion spot. Not only was their 12,400 home attendance 26th in the country last year, but they are located farther east than any of the other Midwest members of the conference. Contrast them with St Louis, which sits 362 miles farther west and averaged 7,673 in attendance last year. Which of those 2 is more likely to deliver fans at tournament time? VCU averaged 7693 in attendance last year, only a tick higher than St Louis, but they are also only a 333 mile drive up I-95 from Richmond and an easy commute to the tournament by Amtrak or air line. Richmond, the other frequently mentioned expansion candidate has the same location advantage as VCU but attendance last year (5960) that was under 6000 and barely made the top 100 in the country (95th).
The economics of the new conference normally focus on TV ratings and TV market, but ticket sales at the tournament are a big deal and relate heavily to the conference's ability to sell its tournament to the TV networks. It will be interesting to see how these economics effect expansion decisions when and if that time comes.
Bill Marsh wrote:Taking in all of the pageantry associated with Media Day got me to thinking about the only other time that the Big East teams all come together under one roof - the Big East Tournament.
Last year the tournament averaged 20,000 attendance per session. Contrast that with the Atlantic Ten tournament , which averaged 6,000 per session across the river at the Barclay Center. That's the conference from which 2 of the 3 new members will be coming. Creighton is used to bigger numbers than that at its conference tournament, which averaged 14,000 last year.
Will the new Big East be able to sell out the Garden as the old version did? Will the tournament be a happening?
If they don't sell out, expansion will be coming sooner rather than later in order to sell more tickets. That thought makes me realize why Dayton is still in the running for an expansion spot. Not only was their 12,400 home attendance 26th in the country last year, but they are located farther east than any of the other Midwest members of the conference. Contrast them with St Louis, which sits 362 miles farther west and averaged 7,673 in attendance last year. Which of those 2 is more likely to deliver fans at tournament time? VCU averaged 7693 in attendance last year, only a tick higher than St Louis, but they are also only a 333 mile drive up I-95 from Richmond and an easy commute to the tournament by Amtrak or air line. Richmond, the other frequently mentioned expansion candidate has the same location advantage as VCU but attendance last year (5960) that was under 6000 and barely made the top 100 in the country (95th).
The economics of the new conference normally focus on TV ratings and TV market, but ticket sales at the tournament are a big deal and relate heavily to the conference's ability to sell its tournament to the TV networks. It will be interesting to see how these economics effect expansion decisions when and if that time comes.
redmen9194 wrote:Love Lavin's quote about the league:
“Like a neighborhood, we’re at a place where the homes, the schools, the basketball programs are similar. There’s a common thread. We look like one another, we mirror one another as institutions. When you add the fact that it’s all basketball — no football — that makes us unique. It gives us distinction. That’s how we’re going to brand this league and drive this league. We’re the old soul, love of the game league…if you’re a basketball-head, basketball junkie, basketball jones, it’s going to be the Big East that you’re going to have an affinity for.”
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 17 guests