by XUFan09 » Wed Jan 15, 2014 10:43 pm
The better team, no matter if the bench is short, does not allow a lead well into the double digits to turn into a double-digit loss. The claim of "better team" is particularly suspect if you shoot 70% from three to build that lead when you're a 33% three-point shooting team, no matter the quality of the opponent's defense. Law of averages will play out there. Also, conditioning does factor into the determination of a team's quality, and Georgetown's starting guards are already used to playing a lot of minutes, both being nationally ranked in that category. So "fatigue" doesn't suddenly turn the double-digit loser into clearly the better team.
The game was already close again before fatigue could even be claimed as a convenient excuse. Xavier cut it down to 7 with 12:40 to go. They cut it down to 2 with 8:27 to go. So with more than 20% of the game to play, it was close again and Georgetown's big lead had been eliminated. Fatigue may have made Georgetown bottom out a little later, which helped lead to the double-digit loss (combined with some really, really dumb shots near the end, which involves the opposite of being a good team), but it can't really be used as an excuse for having given up the lead with that much time left.
Gangsters in the locker room