GumbyDamnit! wrote:My goodness, some on here must simply have a completely different set of standards about expansion than I do I guess. Siena? Holy Cross? Northeastern? Boston U?
There should be NO reason to bring on a program to this conference that needs to be "brought along," and taugght how to be successful. We are the BIG-Freaking-EAST!!!!
Expand only if it makes you better: Gonzaga, UConn; maybe VCU, UNLV, BYU. SLU, Dayton, Cincy, Temple, Memphis = 2nd tier, no thanks. All the rest = yawn.
Hold onto the round robin and continue to tout that we are the premier hoops-only league. It is working...let it grow. Then take programs that make us better. Period. Maybe wait and see if there are more FB shakeups. Who's to say they don't go to (4) 16 team leagues and our prospective pool of programs becomes deeper and wider.
billyjack wrote:GumbyDamnit! wrote:My goodness, some on here must simply have a completely different set of standards about expansion than I do I guess. Siena? Holy Cross? Northeastern? Boston U?
There should be NO reason to bring on a program to this conference that needs to be "brought along," and taugght how to be successful. We are the BIG-Freaking-EAST!!!!
Expand only if it makes you better: Gonzaga, UConn; maybe VCU, UNLV, BYU. SLU, Dayton, Cincy, Temple, Memphis = 2nd tier, no thanks. All the rest = yawn.
Hold onto the round robin and continue to tout that we are the premier hoops-only league. It is working...let it grow. Then take programs that make us better. Period. Maybe wait and see if there are more FB shakeups. Who's to say they don't go to (4) 16 team leagues and our prospective pool of programs becomes deeper and wider.
Gumby, there was a discussion about getting a team into Boston, so i spent a couple of minutes to look at the only possible options to do that. All are poor choices. I just put the information down. Me, i don't want to expand. If we do though, my first choice would be go with Gonzaga and stop at 11. But i want to stick with 10.
GumbyDamnit! wrote:My goodness, some on here must simply have a completely different set of standards about expansion than I do I guess. Siena? Holy Cross? Northeastern? Boston U?
There should be NO reason to bring on a program to this conference that needs to be "brought along," and taugght how to be successful. We are the BIG-Freaking-EAST!!!!
Expand only if it makes you better: Gonzaga, UConn; maybe VCU, UNLV, BYU. SLU, Dayton, Cincy, Temple, Memphis = 2nd tier, no thanks. All the rest = yawn.
Hold onto the round robin and continue to tout that we are the premier hoops-only league. It is working...let it grow. Then take programs that make us better. Period. Maybe wait and see if there are more FB shakeups. Who's to say they don't go to (4) 16 team leagues and our prospective pool of programs becomes deeper and wider.
GumbyDamnit! wrote:billyjack wrote:GumbyDamnit! wrote:My goodness, some on here must simply have a completely different set of standards about expansion than I do I guess. Siena? Holy Cross? Northeastern? Boston U?
There should be NO reason to bring on a program to this conference that needs to be "brought along," and taugght how to be successful. We are the BIG-Freaking-EAST!!!!
Expand only if it makes you better: Gonzaga, UConn; maybe VCU, UNLV, BYU. SLU, Dayton, Cincy, Temple, Memphis = 2nd tier, no thanks. All the rest = yawn.
Hold onto the round robin and continue to tout that we are the premier hoops-only league. It is working...let it grow. Then take programs that make us better. Period. Maybe wait and see if there are more FB shakeups. Who's to say they don't go to (4) 16 team leagues and our prospective pool of programs becomes deeper and wider.
Gumby, there was a discussion about getting a team into Boston, so i spent a couple of minutes to look at the only possible options to do that. All are poor choices. I just put the information down. Me, i don't want to expand. If we do though, my first choice would be go with Gonzaga and stop at 11. But i want to stick with 10.
I get it BJack. Just frustrated by the expansion talk that starts with programs that the A-10 and C-USA usually consider. I just think we have a great thing going... Why dilute it with slop when we can sit back, continue to develop and have our pick of the litter in a couple years when the FB dreams of great BB programs are ultimately dashed?
.What teams were added?
Team A, Team B
What do they bring to the table?
Huge new markets
What circumstances led to their inclusion?
The south rose again
What, if anything, would change about the league with these teams?
Zilch
RDinNY wrote:I love having 10, with each team playing each other twice. I hope even if we expand to 12, we find a way to continue that. That would mean 22 conference games for each team and might be hard to do.
Last night, during they Iowa State/ Kansas game. Jay Bilas incorrectly stated that the Big 12 is the only conference that has the true round robin format. Somehow, he forgets that the Big East exists.
RDinNY wrote:I love having 10, with each team playing each other twice. I hope even if we expand to 12, we find a way to continue that. That would mean 22 conference games for each team and might be hard to do.
Last night, during they Iowa State/ Kansas game. Jay Bilas incorrectly stated that the Big 12 is the only conference that has the true round robin format. Somehow, he forgets that the Big East exists.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 32 guests