Bill Marsh wrote:XBand15 wrote:its funny you bring up George Mason and Wichita State. I was tempted to compare VCU to these exact two schools earlier. The funny thing is, they compare pretty well on paper. Honestly I believe the only thing that keeps VCU in the discussion and these team's out is the Richmond market. If VCU were in a bad market town aka Wichita or in the metro area of a city were we already have a team, they wouldn't be in the discussion plain and simple. It would be all Richmond. So like I said, this is about more than just basketball. Sure I agree to disagree with you Bill on the viability of VCU as a basketball program but they are playing good basketball right now but that can't be all we look at. I would much rather take a school that is a better fit as a whole than a team with not much to offer but a "good" basketball program.
Yes, agree to disagree, but the banter is fun and the challenge of disagreement is good exercise for the brain. I appreciate the different POV and the exchange of ideas.
VCU has been sending teams to the NCAA tournament every decade for 4 decades? Within the past decade alone, they have sent 6 different teams to the tournament with 3 different coaches. It was actually Anthony Grant's VCU team that upset Duke in 2007 that put them on the map before Shaka took them to the Final Four. You simply can't make the same statements about GMU or Wichita State either with regard to sustained success or with recent success under multiple coaches.
cm5yz6 wrote:It is interesting to me that supporters of VCU joining the conference seem to feel that they need to incessantly show why they belong. Meanwhile, although there is some merit-slinging, Richmond and SLU fans are quieter. Maybe there is a point to the fact that these two fan bases don’t seem like they need to validate their potential inclusion every time there is a possible avenue to do so.
cm5yz6 wrote:Richmond and SLU fans are quieter.
Natty wrote:cm5yz6 wrote:Richmond and SLU fans are quieter.
It's called passion homie. You mad that VCU fans actually give a s#!t?
Natty wrote:cm5yz6 wrote:Richmond and SLU fans are quieter.
It's called passion and marginal employment, homie.
cm5yz6 wrote:It is interesting to me that supporters of VCU joining the conference seem to feel that they need to incessantly show why they belong. Meanwhile, although there is some merit-slinging, Richmond and SLU fans are quieter. Maybe there is a point to the fact that these two fan bases don’t seem like they need to validate their potential inclusion every time there is a possible avenue to do so.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests