Bill Marsh wrote:You're absolutely right, Warrior. The Big East is more stable today than it was 10 years ago. Just to be clear, stability is not the issue for me, long term earning power is.
I don't see West Virginia, or UConn, or Kansas, or any other football school coming to the Big East. Those days are over. If the Big 12 implodes, the remnants will likely form a new all sports conference with the best of the American. At least, that's how I see it.
Bill Marsh wrote:So why wasn't BE Football generating more revenue? College sports in general and football in particular don't have the following in the Northeast that they do in other parts of the country. Without ratings/viewers, TV contracts are going to be smaller as they were for the old BE vs the other power conferences. My POV is that it was money that broke up the old BE more than football in and of itself. Money continues to be a factor in the path that lies ahead.
GoldenWarrior11 wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:You're absolutely right, Warrior. The Big East is more stable today than it was 10 years ago. Just to be clear, stability is not the issue for me, long term earning power is.
I don't see West Virginia, or UConn, or Kansas, or any other football school coming to the Big East. Those days are over. If the Big 12 implodes, the remnants will likely form a new all sports conference with the best of the American. At least, that's how I see it.
I agree with you, Bill. But, let's look at the possibility of three schools being left behind in the Big 12: Iowa State, Kansas State and Baylor (as an example). Those three, coupled with BYU/Colorado State/Houston/SMU/Tulsa/Memphis/Cincinnati/UCF/USF still isn't getting a Big 12 deal. I find it hard that this group evens gets a substantial bump from the current AAC deal. Would it be more financially viable, then, for certain football programs to go independent (BYU, ISU, KSU, BU, UConn, Temple, Cincinnati, BYU, UMass) and have a defacto "Independent" scheduling agreement? Those schools then would park Olympics in more regional-based conferences, thus saving money on travel and other expenses.
FBS Independence, today - IMHO, is a death-sentence for a football program. However, there was a point in time where many successful football programs were independents. If there was a collaborative decision from a handful of schools to go that route (thus keeping all TV revenue for themselves regionally for any football games), it *could* end up being a better financial decision for these types of schools, rather than being in a national G5 conference where you are sending your teams all over the place in hopes of getting a lottery ticket out.
Again, I'm not saying this will happen, but I do think more athletic programs need to have alternative methods of success for FBS football, rather than - especially for AAC/G5 schools - hoping for the best and praying against the worst.
Bluejay wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:So why wasn't BE Football generating more revenue? College sports in general and football in particular don't have the following in the Northeast that they do in other parts of the country. Without ratings/viewers, TV contracts are going to be smaller as they were for the old BE vs the other power conferences. My POV is that it was money that broke up the old BE more than football in and of itself. Money continues to be a factor in the path that lies ahead.
I can answer the bolded question for you, but I don't think you will like the answer.
I live out here where college football is king. I can tell you that people in the midwest, great plains and the south, simply did not think that BE football was very good. It generated little to no respect outside of the northeast corridor once the Miamis and Virginia Techs departed. Since those departures, BE football was forever devoid of national championship caliber teams. Further, fans of what were then the Big 12, Big 10 and the SEC snickered about any ranked teams out of the Big East. The thought, which was probably correct, is that the best teams in the BE would not stand a chance of having the same bloated conference records if they were in a better conference.
Except on a very rare occasion, CFB fans outside of the northeast were not going to tune in BE FB games to the detriment of their own conferences and the other "better" conferences for which they had much more respect. As a result, the games didn't garner the same ratings of the other conferences that housed the traditional CFB powers (outside of ND obviously), which, in turn, lead to BE FB not generating more TV revenues. Likewise, the stadia for BE FB teams are generally smaller, sometimes significantly so, than a lot of the stadia in the SEC, Big 10, Big 12, etc. Nebraska's stadium holds around 100K and is sold out every game for some insane amount of time. SEC stadiums are usually packed. The Big House, the Horseshoe, and Oklahoma,Texas and Tennessee are huge. Take 100K and multiply it by a very conservative figure of $20 a ticket and you've got $2M in revenues for every home game (that revenue figure is substantially understated as the average ticket price is surely larger). By comparison, BE stadiums did not fill up as reliably; and even if they did fill up, they were usually much smaller, resulting in significantly less revenues.
I do not mean to offend anyone that may have been a big BE Fb fan, but I assure you that was the perception of BE FB outside of the northeast.
Bill Marsh wrote:You're absolutely right, Warrior. The Big East is more stable today than it was 10 years ago. Just to be clear, stability is not the issue for me, long term earning power is.
I don't see West Virginia, or UConn, or Kansas, or any other football school coming to the Big East. Those days are over. If the Big 12 implodes, the remnants will likely form a new all sports conference with the best of the American. At least, that's how I see it.
GoldenWarrior11 wrote:I agree with you, Bill. But, let's look at the possibility of three schools being left behind in the Big 12: Iowa State, Kansas State and Baylor (as an example). Those three, coupled with BYU/Colorado State/Houston/SMU/Tulsa/Memphis/Cincinnati/UCF/USF still isn't getting a Big 12 deal. I find it hard that this group evens gets a substantial bump from the current AAC deal. Would it be more financially viable, then, for certain football programs to go independent (BYU, ISU, KSU, BU, UConn, Temple, Cincinnati, BYU, UMass) and have a defacto "Independent" scheduling agreement? Those schools then would park Olympics in more regional-based conferences, thus saving money on travel and other expenses.
FBS Independence, today - IMHO, is a death-sentence for a football program. However, there was a point in time where many successful football programs were independents. If there was a collaborative decision from a handful of schools to go that route (thus keeping all TV revenue for themselves regionally for any football games), it *could* end up being a better financial decision for these types of schools, rather than being in a national G5 conference where you are sending your teams all over the place in hopes of getting a lottery ticket out.
Again, I'm not saying this will happen, but I do think more athletic programs need to have alternative methods of success for FBS football, rather than - especially for AAC/G5 schools - hoping for the best and praying against the worst.
Toronto Rapture wrote:Some people speculate that it is only a matter of time before ND is no longer an independent. If that were to happen, it would be a further indictment over remaining independent in football in today's landscape, and going into the future. But things could change.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 22 guests