handdownmandown wrote:It’s easy for me to say as a Creighton fan, but a ‘bad’ performance in conference doesn’t mean you’re a bad team, at least this season.
This year’s last place team will be at least as good as the 9-9 scrum that tied for third last year, and probably better. It’s just that team might be 5-13 or something.
As an outsider I think that SJU has more going for it now than it has since the conference reformed. I thought the Lavin bunch was a group of highly talented but undisciplined underachievers, and Mullin should have gotten a lot better results than he did.
REDMEN1415 wrote:handdownmandown wrote:It’s easy for me to say as a Creighton fan, but a ‘bad’ performance in conference doesn’t mean you’re a bad team, at least this season.
This year’s last place team will be at least as good as the 9-9 scrum that tied for third last year, and probably better. It’s just that team might be 5-13 or something.
As an outsider I think that SJU has more going for it now than it has since the conference reformed. I thought the Lavin bunch was a group of highly talented but undisciplined underachievers, and Mullin should have gotten a lot better results than he did.
Everyone wants to say there's not much talent on sju, if that's case then how did we go up 14 vs.shu with 16 minutes left, up 17 on g-town, from down 22 to up 5 then blowning it..
Cma wanted to bleed the clock, we aren't good at doing that.
I wanted to keep forcing the pace.
Cma isn't a good in game coach ewing made adjustments, where was Anderson's?
Why wasn't Roberts, Sears, or even steere in to disrupt the big Turk?
scoscox wrote:REDMEN1415 wrote:handdownmandown wrote:It’s easy for me to say as a Creighton fan, but a ‘bad’ performance in conference doesn’t mean you’re a bad team, at least this season.
This year’s last place team will be at least as good as the 9-9 scrum that tied for third last year, and probably better. It’s just that team might be 5-13 or something.
As an outsider I think that SJU has more going for it now than it has since the conference reformed. I thought the Lavin bunch was a group of highly talented but undisciplined underachievers, and Mullin should have gotten a lot better results than he did.
Everyone wants to say there's not much talent on sju, if that's case then how did we go up 14 vs.shu with 16 minutes left, up 17 on g-town, from down 22 to up 5 then blowning it..
Cma wanted to bleed the clock, we aren't good at doing that.
I wanted to keep forcing the pace.
Cma isn't a good in game coach ewing made adjustments, where was Anderson's?
Why wasn't Roberts, Sears, or even steere in to disrupt the big Turk?
This was the knock on him at Arkansas as well. I think it's a combination of that and that you don't have a lot of talent to cover that up.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 44 guests