murphy wrote:RDinNY wrote:Malcolm X connection?
in the late 80's early 90's it became very popular for young adults to wear shirts and hats sporting the letter "X" in remembrance of Malcom X and his legacy as a civil rights icon, especially appealing to teenagers. A number of good athletes began to associate Xavier and "X" with this logo and were attracted to attend Xavier to have the opportunity to showcase "X" (Malcolm) . Xavier coaches and administration quickly understood the connection and branded the team with the X name, logo everwhere. This marketing strategy was a success and snowballed as the better athletes that were attracted increased the skill level of the teams and as the Xavier teams advanced in the NCAA the X symbol was out there on national TV and the cycle continues to this day.
murphy wrote:Xudash wrote:Boyee wrote:As a DePaul University alumnus, it makes me very happy to see DePaul in 1st place, especially as they haven't made the NCAA Tournament since 2004 and made a decent NIT run in 2007. They do have to play @ Villanova next.
It all worked out for the best, from my point of view as a Xavier alumnus, when it comes to Xavier being in the Big East and with the 10 teams that comprise this conference. Having noted that, I've not liked DePaul for a number of years due to the stance it took in the early 80's, which was about being against the formation of what could have become a rather formidable league of midwestern Catholic schools, including ND, DePaul and X. Those were the Ray Meyer years when DePaul was on top.
I am glad to be associated with DePaul now, even though its recent basketball resume has been lacking. In my opinion, DePaul is very close to becoming formidable again IF it makes the right moves. From what I've read, the right moves include blowing out your current AD and blowing out Oliver Purnell. Not that OP is a bad guy, but he's just not the guy that DePaul needs to take it to the next level; a level that it used to know all too well. Imagine DePaul with Chicago as its backyard, with its new building, with a solid athletic administration and with an effective coaching staff.
On that note, I'll ask the question again: especially with the new building coming online, will DePaul's President act properly, firing the AD and Oliver Purnell and putting real talent in their place?
Have to take issue with your re-write of the early 80's - Xavier only starting having winning records (other than in the 60's) around 1986 (when they started capitilizing on Malcom X connection and attracted some decent recruits. Also the Midwest Catholic league would have included UD, Xavier, ND, Marquette, Depaulll, maybe Duquense, Detroit.
pki1998 wrote:murphy wrote:RDinNY wrote:Malcolm X connection?
in the late 80's early 90's it became very popular for young adults to wear shirts and hats sporting the letter "X" in remembrance of Malcom X and his legacy as a civil rights icon, especially appealing to teenagers. A number of good athletes began to associate Xavier and "X" with this logo and were attracted to attend Xavier to have the opportunity to showcase "X" (Malcolm) . Xavier coaches and administration quickly understood the connection and branded the team with the X name, logo everwhere. This marketing strategy was a success and snowballed as the better athletes that were attracted increased the skill level of the teams and as the Xavier teams advanced in the NCAA the X symbol was out there on national TV and the cycle continues to this day.
Trust me I had season tickets to Xavier when they played in Schmidt Fieldhouse. Well before the popularity of Malcom X. I've also lived in Cincinnati all my life, and am a member of St. Xavier parish. Guess what even before the popularity of wearing the X to symbolize Malcolm. X is till referred to Xavier University as X, St Xavier Church as St. X, and St Xavier High School as St. X. They still did the "Let's Go X" cheer before that as well. If I follow this same logic, I guess Cleveland St Ignatius (One of Ohio's High School Football Powerhouses) going by St. I. is about them capitalizing on the phrase "We're #1"
Funny I never heard this comment before the unfortunate brawl in the Crosstown shootout several years ago. This is some made up story that someone posted on the UDPride message board, that Dayton fans now take as gospel. Pretty much the same, as the rumor that Xavier kept UD out of the Big East. Personally I don't think Xavier kept UD out of the Big East. If the C7 wanted Dayton to join, and Xavier was raising a fit, the C7 would have invited UD first and then told X Dayton is in do you want to stay in the A-10 or do you want to join us. But you can't use logic with the UDPride lot, they don't accept it.
murphy wrote:
in the late 80's early 90's it became very popular for young adults to wear shirts and hats sporting the letter "X" in remembrance of Malcom X and his legacy as a civil rights icon, especially appealing to teenagers. A number of good athletes began to associate Xavier and "X" with this logo and were attracted to attend Xavier to have the opportunity to showcase "X" (Malcolm) . Xavier coaches and administration quickly understood the connection and branded the team with the X name, logo everwhere. This marketing strategy was a success and snowballed as the better athletes that were attracted increased the skill level of the teams and as the Xavier teams advanced in the NCAA the X symbol was out there on national TV and the cycle continues to this day.
Trust me I had season tickets to Xavier when they played in Schmidt Fieldhouse. Well before the popularity of Malcom X. I've also lived in Cincinnati all my life, and am a member of St. Xavier parish. Guess what even before the popularity of wearing the X to symbolize Malcolm. X is till referred to Xavier University as X, St Xavier Church as St. X, and St Xavier High School as St. X. They still did the "Let's Go X" cheer before that as well. If I follow this same logic, I guess Cleveland St Ignatius (One of Ohio's High School Football Powerhouses) going by St. I. is about them capitalizing on the phrase "We're #1"
Funny I never heard this comment before the unfortunate brawl in the Crosstown shootout several years ago. This is some made up story that someone posted on the UDPride message board, that Dayton fans now take as gospel. Pretty much the same, as the rumor that Xavier kept UD out of the Big East. Personally I don't think Xavier kept UD out of the Big East. If the C7 wanted Dayton to join, and Xavier was raising a fit, the C7 would have invited UD first and then told X Dayton is in do you want to stay in the A-10 or do you want to join us. But you can't use logic with the UDPride lot, they don't accept it.
pki1998, I am not arguing that Xavier might have used "X" as a logo at some point before 1987 or so, what I am saying is that it was only used to promote the university as a tie in to Malcom X after 1987 or so (right after Byron Larkin's time, who gave X its original boost) when Xavier realized that the popularity of the X logo in the general teenage population was a good strategy to attract high school recruits. There is nothing wrong with this... I am not sure why you are upset that Xavier uses this to their advantage...
R Jay wrote:I'm really starting to believe that Dayton and Wichita State fans are one in the same.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 29 guests