R to the OB wrote:Wait, are you now defending Lavin? Before you've been criticizing him more than anyone else on this board. You can't have it both ways.
And yes, I think Whitehead will be ready for Big East play. Ten games is enough to adjust for someone with that much talent. For the record, I see the Hall narrowly defeating the Johnnies on NYE.
PhillyPirate wrote:St Johns will probably be the easiest team to defend this year. That is why I have them at 6th. Focus all your attention at Harrison and dare everyone else to beat you. Obepka gives gives you nothing on offense, it has been admitted by SJU fans Thomas is mainly a rebounder, everyone else but just scores on putbacks and break aways. Jordan I think is real good and will be able to shoulder the burden but your scoring will really only come from 2 sources. What happens with injuries, foul trouble, or the suspenstion that seems to always surround those 2 guys.
Seton Hall I think has plenty of issues but will be more balanced in that regard. Whitehead, Gibbs, Sina, and Carrington will all be able to contribute. There is also a senior power forward Mobley who can stretch the floor with the 3 and was a big contributor last year.
3 Guard lineup and running more think puts SHU in a better spot than St Johns, though not by that much.
PhillyPirate wrote:St Johns will probably be the easiest team to defend this year. That is why I have them at 6th. Focus all your attention at Harrison and dare everyone else to beat you. Obepka gives gives you nothing on offense, it has been admitted by SJU fans Thomas is mainly a rebounder, everyone else but just scores on putbacks and break aways. Jordan I think is real good and will be able to shoulder the burden but your scoring will really only come from 2 sources. What happens with injuries, foul trouble, or the suspenstion that seems to always surround those 2 guys.
Seton Hall I think has plenty of issues but will be more balanced in that regard. Whitehead, Gibbs, Sina, and Carrington will all be able to contribute. There is also a senior power forward Mobley who can stretch the floor with the 3 and was a big contributor last year.
3 Guard lineup and running more think puts SHU in a better spot than St Johns, though not by that much.
SJHooper wrote:I'm glad Xavier and Nova fans are being honest here. It's just pretty laughable that a brand new team is picked to go dancing with a bunch of babies at #48 while SJ is #85 with some of the best players in the conference who are all veterans. I would have to agree that Lavin must be the sole reason. If we are talking about potential though SHU should be the #85 and SJ should be the #48. SHU is a team that has something like 9 tourney appearances which is barely higher than many mid majors. SJ has been terrible for much of the past 3 decades and has nearly 30. So to expect SHU to go from irrelevant to NCAA tourney while losing some good veterans and gaining rookies is foolish. Someone said "Not all top 20 players start out great". I would go further and say MOST do not have a good start and usually don't start showing their potential until the end of the season i.e. Jordan. The only rookies you see carrying teams are the ones on UK, Duke, Cuse, etc. aka consensus top 5 recruit type players.
Unless Whitehead does his best Tyler Ennis impression and plays nearly perfectly, SHU will definitely not be in the tourney. I'd be impressed if they even sniffed the bubble. I see them as a .500 team.
stever20 wrote:If Whitehead is anything like a top 20 level recruit, Seton Hall will be good. They were 6-12 in conference play with a whopping 4 1 point losses and 2 5 point losses. If he can turn 2/3 of those into wins, they're 10-8 and 21-13 overall. actually probably closer to 23-24 wins because they wouldn't have those 4 OOC losses either. I know folks want to doubt Seton Hall- but they aren't the old Pirates...
And St John's doesn't have much room to talk.
St John's- 1 NCAA win, 4 games since 2000
Seton Hall- 3 NCAA wins, 6 games since 2000
and was brought up that Seton Hall 1st appearance was 1988. Well, Seton Hall has EXACTLY the same number of NCAA tourney appearances as St John's since then. St John's is just as irrelevent now as Seton Hall is. What they did 30+ years ago means pretty much... nothing today. Love how St John's folks on here act like they're some Gods and they own the conference. Nope. Part of the problem with our perception quite frankly is how St John's is in the tank and has been in the tank for quite some time.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 11 guests