redmen9194 wrote:Right. And it's not about who had the better year. It is who won the championship. Just about every sport has a championship tournament or event in which the that does not have the best record could loose and not be the champion. The Men's Basketball Champion for this season is Providence. They played their best basketball when it mattered most, and that's how championships are won.
Vill wrote:Villanova was the regular season champion and top seed in the tourney. PC was the tournament champion. The question is "who had the better year"? If that's what is important then Nova should get more "points" than PC in this arbitrary scale.
Vill wrote:While nova may have underperformed, we did win a game in the NCAA tournament and nearly beat the eventual national champion. PC got a good draw in MSG avoiding Nova and then won a close game vs Creighton before losing in the first game of NCAAT. Again, not sure PC was as amazing at the end as you claim. They won. I give them credit for that. I'd still take Nova's season every day of the week and twice on Sunday.
TheHall wrote:Basically I'm saying I'd take PC's good regular season with the injuries & suspensions & their March run over Nova's strong regular season & march flameout. Depends on your standard what reg season games mean & what the purpose of all the work a team puts in before & during the season really is for.
So Dew you're saying a solid regular season & a BE championship is worse than a very good regular season and a disappointing March? Maybe if VU made the sweet 16 I could agree. Seton Hall's season was made tolerable just by beating you guys in in the BET and it bought KW some time (fair or not) While the Hoyas have had excellent seasons & terrible post-season putting pressure on JT3.
Question I have is what coach Cooley or Wright do you really think is out there on the trail saying they are last season's BE champs....I bet it's not both of them.
Dew wrote:TheHall wrote:Basically I'm saying I'd take PC's good regular season with the injuries & suspensions & their March run over Nova's strong regular season & march flameout. Depends on your standard what reg season games mean & what the purpose of all the work a team puts in before & during the season really is for.
So Dew you're saying a solid regular season & a BE championship is worse than a very good regular season and a disappointing March? Maybe if VU made the sweet 16 I could agree. Seton Hall's season was made tolerable just by beating you guys in in the BET and it bought KW some time (fair or not) While the Hoyas have had excellent seasons & terrible post-season putting pressure on JT3.
Question I have is what coach Cooley or Wright do you really think is out there on the trail saying they are last season's BE champs....I bet it's not both of them.
I will start by saying that I obviously wish we had done more damage in March. However, I would take a dominating 16–2 conference record, a top 10 ranking for the entire season, a MTE title with wins over Kansas and Iowa plus an NCAA tourney win over a Big East tourney title without a sniff of any of the other things I mentioned.
I love the big east tournament and I think winning it is awesome, but I wouldn't give away an entire season of accomplishments for that alone. It seems like that is what you are arguing for.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests