_lh wrote:You are ignoring the article that was posted about UCONN and the state of Connecticut losing millions of dollars. So, no they cannot afford to proceed as they have long term.
No.
I don't care about the rest of the AAC but UCONN and UC for example are both in tight spots trying to be big time football without P5 money to really get them or keep them there. It was a nice ride for UCONN and UC in the old BE but if they don't get into a P5 conference soon, they are going to have to make some tough decisions.
Michael in Raleigh wrote:_lh wrote:You are ignoring the article that was posted about UCONN and the state of Connecticut losing millions of dollars. So, no they cannot afford to proceed as they have long term.
No.
I don't care about the rest of the AAC but UCONN and UC for example are both in tight spots trying to be big time football without P5 money to really get them or keep them there. It was a nice ride for UCONN and UC in the old BE but if they don't get into a P5 conference soon, they are going to have to make some tough decisions.
How is it any different for Houston, Boise State, Colorado State, UCF, USF, or Memphis? All of them badly want to get into Power 5 leagues. All of them are in tight spots trying to be big time football without P5 money. Yet it's only UConn and Cincinnati who are going to have to make some tough decisions?
I don't buy it that UConn or Cincinnati are any more likely to throw in the towel, eventually, on football than any of those other schools. It just seems like UConn and Cincy would be more willing to step back investment in football because they used to be in the Big East.
Michael in Raleigh wrote:_lh wrote:You are ignoring the article that was posted about UCONN and the state of Connecticut losing millions of dollars. So, no they cannot afford to proceed as they have long term.
No.
I don't care about the rest of the AAC but UCONN and UC for example are both in tight spots trying to be big time football without P5 money to really get them or keep them there. It was a nice ride for UCONN and UC in the old BE but if they don't get into a P5 conference soon, they are going to have to make some tough decisions.
How is it any different for Houston, Boise State, Colorado State, UCF, USF, or Memphis? All of them badly want to get into Power 5 leagues. All of them are in tight spots trying to be big time football without P5 money. Yet it's only UConn and Cincinnati who are going to have to make some tough decisions?
I don't buy it that UConn or Cincinnati are any more likely to throw in the towel, eventually, on football than any of those other schools. It just seems like UConn and Cincy would be more willing to step back investment in football because they used to be in the Big East.
NJRedman wrote:Michael in Raleigh wrote:_lh wrote:You are ignoring the article that was posted about UCONN and the state of Connecticut losing millions of dollars. So, no they cannot afford to proceed as they have long term.
No.
I don't care about the rest of the AAC but UCONN and UC for example are both in tight spots trying to be big time football without P5 money to really get them or keep them there. It was a nice ride for UCONN and UC in the old BE but if they don't get into a P5 conference soon, they are going to have to make some tough decisions.
How is it any different for Houston, Boise State, Colorado State, UCF, USF, or Memphis? All of them badly want to get into Power 5 leagues. All of them are in tight spots trying to be big time football without P5 money. Yet it's only UConn and Cincinnati who are going to have to make some tough decisions?
I don't buy it that UConn or Cincinnati are any more likely to throw in the towel, eventually, on football than any of those other schools. It just seems like UConn and Cincy would be more willing to step back investment in football because they used to be in the Big East.
It's different because those schools unlike UConn don't have an actual fall back option to make more money and let their actual school favorite sport thrive in a power conference. Their athletic department could go from red to black almost overnight. They'd have to buy out coaches contracts and probably offer to honor any FB scholarships to the kids currently on the roster if they didn't want to transfer but after that their spending would be much much lower while making more money. None of the other G5 schools have that option.
Bill Marsh wrote:NJRedman wrote:Michael in Raleigh wrote:
How is it any different for Houston, Boise State, Colorado State, UCF, USF, or Memphis? All of them badly want to get into Power 5 leagues. All of them are in tight spots trying to be big time football without P5 money. Yet it's only UConn and Cincinnati who are going to have to make some tough decisions?
I don't buy it that UConn or Cincinnati are any more likely to throw in the towel, eventually, on football than any of those other schools. It just seems like UConn and Cincy would be more willing to step back investment in football because they used to be in the Big East.
It's different because those schools unlike UConn don't have an actual fall back option to make more money and let their actual school favorite sport thrive in a power conference. Their athletic department could go from red to black almost overnight. They'd have to buy out coaches contracts and probably offer to honor any FB scholarships to the kids currently on the roster if they didn't want to transfer but after that their spending would be much much lower while making more money. None of the other G5 schools have that option.
You're ignoring money that is available to them from other sources.
NJRedman wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:NJRedman wrote:
It's different because those schools unlike UConn don't have an actual fall back option to make more money and let their actual school favorite sport thrive in a power conference. Their athletic department could go from red to black almost overnight. They'd have to buy out coaches contracts and probably offer to honor any FB scholarships to the kids currently on the roster if they didn't want to transfer but after that their spending would be much much lower while making more money. None of the other G5 schools have that option.
You're ignoring money that is available to them from other sources.
I pointed out how they are different. Don't change the subject. UConn has options those other schools don't. I know I know Bill Marsh lives in CT so he knows everything going on at the school. Still doesn't change the fact that they are hemorrhaging money through their chase for a spot in the FB5 that seems more and more unlikely with each passing month.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 26 guests