GumbyDamnit! wrote:Def tough scheduling for both Butler and SHU but it's a marathon not a sprint. Creighton is going to be interesting to watch this year. They have the biggest home court advantage in the league IMO. I expect them to get at least 6 or 7 home wins in conf. If they can beat DePaul away and steal 1 or 2 others, they could finish .500 or better. That gets them on the bubble.
hoyahooligan wrote:It'll be interesting to see how much Creighton's home court is really worth. I thought it was overblown going into the season. After the Oklahoma win, I thought there might be something to it. But after watching St. Mary's win there, and South Dakota take them to 2OT I'm back to thinking the whole thing is a little overblown. I don't think Creighton's home court is really worth more than the 4pts everyone elses is and I think Creighton is more than 4pts worse than most of the other BE teams. The crowd and noise level really cause a miniscule effect. Most of road games being harder is just the fact that it's a different environment.
hoyahooligan wrote:It'll be interesting to see how much Creighton's home court is really worth. I thought it was overblown going into the season. After the Oklahoma win, I thought there might be something to it. But after watching St. Mary's win there, and South Dakota take them to 2OT I'm back to thinking the whole thing is a little overblown. I don't think Creighton's home court is really worth more than the 4pts everyone elses is and I think Creighton is more than 4pts worse than most of the other BE teams. The crowd and noise level really cause a miniscule effect. Most of road games being harder is just the fact that it's a different environment.
R Jay wrote:hoyahooligan wrote:It'll be interesting to see how much Creighton's home court is really worth. I thought it was overblown going into the season. After the Oklahoma win, I thought there might be something to it. But after watching St. Mary's win there, and South Dakota take them to 2OT I'm back to thinking the whole thing is a little overblown. I don't think Creighton's home court is really worth more than the 4pts everyone elses is and I think Creighton is more than 4pts worse than most of the other BE teams. The crowd and noise level really cause a miniscule effect. Most of road games being harder is just the fact that it's a different environment.
Not that I disagree completely, but we did have a 24 game winning streak coming into the St. Mary's game. The truth was that it was going to end at some point. We are still 168-26 at CenturyLink Center. And around 110 of those wins aren't because of Dougie and friends...
muskienick wrote:I believe the three "newbies" have a bit more to prove than the 7 holdovers from the Big East, especially Villanova, Georgetown, and Marquette. Those seven competed for years against the likes of very fine Louisville, UConn, Pitt, WVU, etc. teams. The newbies didn't have to face that level of competition during their Conference seasons for the most part.
So, in 2-3 more years, with consistently decent showings by the newbies (on the floor, in the polls, and in the post-season), Butler, Creighton, and Xavier will be given the respect they have earned.
stever20 wrote:GumbyDamnit! wrote:Def tough scheduling for both Butler and SHU but it's a marathon not a sprint. Creighton is going to be interesting to watch this year. They have the biggest home court advantage in the league IMO. I expect them to get at least 6 or 7 home wins in conf. If they can beat DePaul away and steal 1 or 2 others, they could finish .500 or better. That gets them on the bubble.
.500 for Creighton doesn't get them even close to the bubble unless they win 2 games in the conference tourney. They are 9-4 right now, you add 9-9 and that's 18-13. Even 2 wins in the tourney and they're only 20-14 and even that's difficult to get in the tourney with a record that mediocre. Creighton really needs 11 wins in conference play to get in the tourney IMO. That gets them to 20-11 going into the BET and should get them in.
As St John's showed last year, a bad start can be fatal. They were 7-2 2nd half of the conference season(2nd best) but because of the hole they dug early, they were out. Or a team like Butler who never recovered from their slow start. It can get real late real quickly. Given how most every team needs 10 conference wins, you go 0-3, and you are faced with going 10-5 the rest of the way to get in. That's tough in a league with as much parity as we have.
muskienick wrote:I believe the three "newbies" have a bit more to prove than the 7 holdovers from the Big East, especially Villanova, Georgetown, and Marquette. Those seven competed for years against the likes of very fine Louisville, UConn, Pitt, WVU, etc. teams. The newbies didn't have to face that level of competition during their Conference seasons for the most part.
So, in 2-3 more years, with consistently decent showings by the newbies (on the floor, in the polls, and in the post-season), Butler, Creighton, and Xavier will be given the respect they have earned.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 15 guests