Bill Marsh wrote:
I agree with both of you. There is no more important position on a college basketball team than PG. And no team this side of PC was more dependent on their PG than Georgetown where Starks played 37 mpg. So, it will be irritant for DSR to make a Cotton like transition to the point.
However, it is also true that no team is less dependent on the PG to run the offense than Georgetown where every player is expected to make passes and set up their teammates. The fact that Georgetown is bringing in a quality PG means that DSR can get some relief and will be able to spend some time off the ball to concentrate on scoring.
Wizard of Westroads wrote:I expect a strong bounceback from GT. Two biggest question marks for me are (1) loss of Starks, who was great. It's easy enough to pass around the PG duties, but not the leadership. (2) Just not that high on Josh Smith. He can put up some numbers, but it's never seemed like the team (either GT or UCLA) really plays well when he's in.
Wizard of Westroads wrote:I expect a strong bounceback from GT. Two biggest question marks for me are (1) loss of Starks, who was great. It's easy enough to pass around the PG duties, but not the leadership. (2) Just not that high on Josh Smith. He can put up some numbers, but it's never seemed like the team (either GT or UCLA) really plays well when he's in.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 34 guests