stever20 wrote:HoosierPal wrote:LeMoyne00 wrote:SMU's loss hurts, but will it really drop the #25 team in the nation from a 9/10 projected seed to not making it? My guess is they'll be a 13 seed.
No way to sugar coat this, losing to Houston is a bad loss but it is not devastating. The Mustangs finish as 25-9, and a 4-5 Top 50 Record and for now an RPI of 45. That's not a bad hand of cards to hold when playing poker with the other bubble teams. Likely they stay in the field in the Last Four In.
RPI actually 52 not 45. Also they are 23-9 not 25-9.
HoosierPal wrote:LeMoyne00 wrote:SMU's loss hurts, but will it really drop the #25 team in the nation from a 9/10 projected seed to not making it? My guess is they'll be a 13 seed.
No way to sugar coat this, losing to Houston is a bad loss but it is not devastating. The Mustangs finish as 25-9, and a 4-5 Top 50 Record and for now an RPI of 45. That's not a bad hand of cards to hold when playing poker with the other bubble teams. Likely they stay in the field in the Last Four In.
Bill Marsh wrote:HoosierPal wrote:LeMoyne00 wrote:SMU's loss hurts, but will it really drop the #25 team in the nation from a 9/10 projected seed to not making it? My guess is they'll be a 13 seed.
No way to sugar coat this, losing to Houston is a bad loss but it is not devastating. The Mustangs finish as 25-9, and a 4-5 Top 50 Record and for now an RPI of 45. That's not a bad hand of cards to hold when playing poker with the other bubble teams. Likely they stay in the field in the Last Four In.
Not devastating? It certainly could be. They now have an RPI of 53 on Live-RPI and 3 terrible losses:
145 - Houston
176 - Temple
225 - South Florida
As problematic as their bad losses is their road/neutral court record where they were a .500 team (8-8),they simply were not the same dominant team when they weren't in their own gym. The committee wants to pick teams who will play well in the tournament. They were 1-5 vs teams in the top 100 away from their home court. That doesn't project well for their ability to compete in the tournament and it's not what the committee is looking for.
stever20 wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:HoosierPal wrote:
No way to sugar coat this, losing to Houston is a bad loss but it is not devastating. The Mustangs finish as 25-9, and a 4-5 Top 50 Record and for now an RPI of 45. That's not a bad hand of cards to hold when playing poker with the other bubble teams. Likely they stay in the field in the Last Four In.
Not devastating? It certainly could be. They now have an RPI of 53 on Live-RPI and 3 terrible losses:
145 - Houston
176 - Temple
225 - South Florida
As problematic as their bad losses is their road/neutral court record where they were a .500 team (8-8),they simply were not the same dominant team when they weren't in their own gym. The committee wants to pick teams who will play well in the tournament. They were 1-5 vs teams in the top 100 away from their home court. That doesn't project well for their ability to compete in the tournament and it's not what the committee is looking for.
a lot of teams aren't good away from home. I mean for gosh sakes Providence is only 8-8 away from home. Xavier is 5-9 away from home- including 2 bad losses. Their only 2 wins away from home of note- @ St Johns, and neutral vs Cincy(wonder how the committee would view that). Everything else was against a sub .500 team.- DePaul, Butler, and Alabama.
ruechalgrin wrote:If the committee is consistent, SMU is last 4 in at best and probably out.
4-6 top 100 and only 1 road/neutral top 100 win. 19-2 101+, are you kidding me 21 games 101+. OOC SOS 291!?!?! 9-9 Road/Neutral. They should be punished for their absolute horrific OOC scheduling; 1 top 100 R/N Win (2nd best R/N is Wyoming Away, then Texas A&M neutral); only 4 top 100 wins; playing only 10 top 100 teams. Just as a comparison Dayton, has 10 top 100 wins (10-6) and Xavier has 8 top 100 wins (8-8). If Dayton and Xavier are not seeded above SMU, it is a joke.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests