Westbrook36 wrote:Lavinwood wrote:Westbrook36 wrote:Yeah I agree Gumby, we're looking very promising. Sharing the ball, balanced scoring, limiting TO's, taking good shots(well 85% of the time), forcing TO's and hustling on D; lots to like. All this without Ennis playing a minute yet.
But this board has spoken, Nova is a mediocre, middle of the road, run of the mill, NIT team.
Says who? Even before Marquette got spanked I thought Nova had a legitimate chance of being a top 15 team and winning the conference. Nova is a rock. Consistent, always good, always competitive, and always starts out with little hype but always seems to make the tourney and knock off some big guys.
That's a slight exaggeration, but it's pretty much been this whole boards opinion all off-season that Nova isn't as good as Marquette, Creighton, Georgetown, St. John's, and maybe Providence. I'm just preparing everyone for the "I told you so", later in the year if Nova is as good as I think they're going to be.
Westbrook36 wrote:Lavinwood wrote:Westbrook36 wrote:Yeah I agree Gumby, we're looking very promising. Sharing the ball, balanced scoring, limiting TO's, taking good shots(well 85% of the time), forcing TO's and hustling on D; lots to like. All this without Ennis playing a minute yet.
But this board has spoken, Nova is a mediocre, middle of the road, run of the mill, NIT team.
Says who? Even before Marquette got spanked I thought Nova had a legitimate chance of being a top 15 team and winning the conference. Nova is a rock. Consistent, always good, always competitive, and always starts out with little hype but always seems to make the tourney and knock off some big guys.
That's a slight exaggeration, but it's pretty much been this whole boards opinion all off-season that Nova isn't as good as Marquette, Creighton, Georgetown, St. John's, and maybe Providence. I'm just preparing everyone for the "I told you so", later in the year if Nova is as good as I think they're going to be.
Westbrook36 wrote:Lavinwood wrote:Westbrook36 wrote:Yeah I agree Gumby, we're looking very promising. Sharing the ball, balanced scoring, limiting TO's, taking good shots(well 85% of the time), forcing TO's and hustling on D; lots to like. All this without Ennis playing a minute yet.
But this board has spoken, Nova is a mediocre, middle of the road, run of the mill, NIT team.
Says who? Even before Marquette got spanked I thought Nova had a legitimate chance of being a top 15 team and winning the conference. Nova is a rock. Consistent, always good, always competitive, and always starts out with little hype but always seems to make the tourney and knock off some big guys.
That's a slight exaggeration, but it's pretty much been this whole boards opinion all off-season that Nova isn't as good as Marquette, Creighton, Georgetown, St. John's, and maybe Providence. I'm just preparing everyone for the "I told you so", later in the year if Nova is as good as I think they're going to be.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 52 guests