dmac80 wrote:My take is while certain obvious programs have been more successful than others in the last 10-15 years, no one from the big east has won it all more than once and no one has won since the mid 1980s.....further those who have been successful have mostly been making the dance and or sweet 16, it's not like semi annual final four runs or anything. I hope that this newer non football incarnation sees more movement and jockeying for the top spots year over year.
handdownmandown wrote:It'll still be relatively civil, since everyone needs everyone else to be terrific for the sake of the conference. But once that dissipates its gonna be a donnybrook. There's a definite undercurrent of original BE teams/added BE teams/freshly invited BE teams in that order, and if we (CU) pull our weight the first couple years and do what's necessary to establish the conference, that attitude will wind up getting a Return to Sender on it, and I can just see tons of scores being created due to 10 different perspectives.
MUSeashells&Balloons wrote:dmac80 wrote:My take is while certain obvious programs have been more successful than others in the last 10-15 years, no one from the big east has won it all more than once and no one has won since the mid 1980s.....further those who have been successful have mostly been making the dance and or sweet 16, it's not like semi annual final four runs or anything. I hope that this newer non football incarnation sees more movement and jockeying for the top spots year over year.
I agree but we also need major programs year after year that people can say oh the Big East is great they have Georgetown or Villanova. That is what makes a conference at least appear like a power conference. Georgetown, Connecticut and Syracuse served this role for the Big East in the past. Duke and North Carolina for the ACC. Kansas for the Big 12. Kentucky for the Sec. Indiana for the B1G. I do think its important we have a team or two or three like that. I think right now Georgetown's probably that team that has that mind share. Maybe Villanova or Marquette for 2 or 3(just as I see it right now).
That being said one of the great things about the big east is it is always closer than other conferences there are a lot more jockeying for spots and in my opinion thats what makes it a great. But I do think having the perception of a premier program is good for the league and its perception of being a power conference.
GumbyDamnit! wrote:handdownmandown wrote:It'll still be relatively civil, since everyone needs everyone else to be terrific for the sake of the conference. But once that dissipates its gonna be a donnybrook. There's a definite undercurrent of original BE teams/added BE teams/freshly invited BE teams in that order, and if we (CU) pull our weight the first couple years and do what's necessary to establish the conference, that attitude will wind up getting a Return to Sender on it, and I can just see tons of scores being created due to 10 different perspectives.
As a fan of a long-time BE school I can tell you from my own perspective that there may be some loyalty built around decades of competition but I do not think there is necessarily a pecking order. In fact I will say that I consider Marq higher up, or more of a true BE team than a Prov & SHU because they have done more for the conference over the past several years. Do the new programs have to earn their strpes a bit? Absolutely, but that is said with respect. I have a feeling that Xavier especially is going to be a consistent top half program. If CU can do the same then they are not sitting at any kids table at the BE Thnaksgiving Feast. In the next 5 years if they are making tourneys and increasing our collective impact on college hoops I will consider them more of a true BE school than a SHU or DePaul if both continue to be basement dwellers. I always thought that SHU, Prov and DePaul needed to get their sh!t together if this league was going to be successful. It looks like that is happening with the former two at least. We need bids and we need to get to FF's. Whicher teams can do that will rise to the top of the pecking order.
Bulldog_Muskie wrote:handdownmandown wrote:Ah, the Big East, where every member is created equal, except some are more equal than others.
I'll tell you what, the differences between the board as it is now and as it will be, say, two years from now will be striking. Irritation is already starting to bubble at the seams; just wait until it starts to boil.
Two years? I'd say we get three weeks into the conference schedule this season and it'll happen!
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests