shupirate98 wrote:The idea that anybody would be scared to play that UConn team is quite frankly hilarious. They stink. As does Tulsa. That game was an insult to the sport of basketball. Two bad teams from a bad league. If I'd spent the whole season pimping for that league I'd be rather embarrassed.
I look forward to Tulsa's 1st-round NIT loss to Charleston Southern.
Bill Marsh wrote:I hope that this puts an end to any further discussion of Tulsa as a potential tournament team.
To think that all of this talk started with the idea that Xavier was going to miss the tournament and that Tulsa was going to make it. two teams whose fortunes have gone in vastly different directions as was evident that they would from caliber of play even a month ago.
Bill Marsh wrote:I hope that this puts an end to any further discussion of Tulsa as a potential tournament team.
To think that all of this talk started with the idea that Xavier was going to miss the tournament and that Tulsa was going to make it. Two teams whose fortunes have gone in vastly different directions as was evident that they would from their caliber of play even a month ago.
stever20 wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:I hope that this puts an end to any further discussion of Tulsa as a potential tournament team.
To think that all of this talk started with the idea that Xavier was going to miss the tournament and that Tulsa was going to make it. Two teams whose fortunes have gone in vastly different directions as was evident that they would from their caliber of play even a month ago.
I think it's interesting what Patrick Stevens said about Tulsa tonight:
Tulsa: The Golden Hurricane probably saw their NCAA hopes end with loss in the American semifinals to Connecticut. The operating word there is "probably," since it's still hard to know exactly the committee will treat Tulsa's loss to Southeastern Oklahoma State. Everything else about the Golden Hurricane's profile screams "too close to call."
They are still #45 RPI, with some candidates not having great ones at all(LSU is #57, Indiana is #60 for gosh sakes). And, we have seen the committee before put teams in worse than them(UAB, Iona, Mid Tennessee come to mind). It wouldn't be the most stunning selection we've seen recently at all. Not by a long shot.
stever20 wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:I hope that this puts an end to any further discussion of Tulsa as a potential tournament team.
To think that all of this talk started with the idea that Xavier was going to miss the tournament and that Tulsa was going to make it. two teams whose fortunes have gone in vastly different directions as was evident that they would from caliber of play even a month ago.
they're a tourney team still. Just NIT. I will say for Xavier- a bounce or two goes differently from the Cincy or Creighton game and you just never know. I think part of their run this week was the knowledge that they were safe going into the tourney. It's amazing when a team clinches how often you see them go on a big run after that.
What will be interesting to see for Tulsa is if they are in that 69-72 range. If so, you know that it was the loss to UConn that killed them....
As for UConn- man I bet they would like to have had that game with Memphis back last Thursday. A win there and they're 21-12 and really interesting going into tomorrow even with a loss. Not saying they'd have been in, but they would have been extremely close I think.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 5 guests