stever20 wrote:I'd say it's going to be a smidge different now than before because the bye structure is totally different than the past few years. Even look back before 2006- the lowest seed that won was a 3.
Bill Marsh wrote:stever20 wrote:I'd say it's going to be a smidge different now than before because the bye structure is totally different than the past few years. Even look back before 2006- the lowest seed that won was a 3.
How do you figure, Steve?
UConn and Syracuse each had to win 5 games in 5 days when they won as 9 seeds. I don't see anything in that old format that made it easier for lower seeds to win the tournament. If anything, it protected the higher seeds even though the results don't reflect that.
stever20 wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:stever20 wrote:I'd say it's going to be a smidge different now than before because the bye structure is totally different than the past few years. Even look back before 2006- the lowest seed that won was a 3.
How do you figure, Steve?
UConn and Syracuse each had to win 5 games in 5 days when they won as 9 seeds. I don't see anything in that old format that made it easier for lower seeds to win the tournament. If anything, it protected the higher seeds even though the results don't reflect that.
by the time #1 seed had to play especially UConn- UConn had already 2 games under their belt. That can be an advantage vs a team that is sitting around waiting to play
(Syracuse when they won only top 12 teams were in the tourney, so only 1 game under the belt).
stever20 wrote:still with everything- 10/14 years, top 3 seeds won the tourney.
ChelseaFriar wrote:Believe PC was a 4 seed the one year they won ('94).
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest