Omaha1 wrote:Creighton's on a long drought to end the half. Went from up 25-20 to losing 33-25. I keep telling you this is going to be a long year for us.
admin wrote:Omaha1 wrote:Creighton's on a long drought to end the half. Went from up 25-20 to losing 33-25. I keep telling you this is going to be a long year for us.
Jays look like a 9th place team tonight. Hopefully they can close out the non-conference part of the schedule strong.
Jet915 wrote:Sorry, piss poor effort by Creighton. We are gonna lose games we should win and win some we should lose (mostly at home). We are NIT at best. Atleast we got the Oklahoma win which helps the Big East and hopefully we'll keep our RPI under 100. If we can get out the the nonconference with just 3 losses, that will be what is expected IMO. Next year, we'll be back.
Edrick wrote:Home environment is certainly something, but its not everything. Anyone in the conference, in any given year, who is going to finish near the bottom is going to drop their home games to the elite teams in the league. That's just how it works. Someone has to finish 8-10 and when 7 programs are Top 50 that's not even that terrible a statement about you.
adoraz wrote:I think nearly all the expected lower half teams this year, with the exception of Marquette, have exceeded expectations so far. Butler was picked #7 and they're ranked. Creighton has a respectable record and a big win. SHU is undefeated. DePaul is playing solid with only 1 loss. Even Marquette is still in an okay position since their schedule has been so difficult.
5-6 of the teams will make the dance and 4-5 won't. Just how it'll work out once conference play starts. It's still difficult to tell who will separate themselves but all we know for certain is some teams will have to.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests