Player Rankings Can Be a Crapshoot

The home for Big East hoops

Re: Player Rankings Can Be a Crapshoot

Postby Fieldhouse Flyer » Thu May 15, 2014 8:41 am

I lost faith in Scout.com’s player ratings a long time ago.


Dayton’s HS Class of 2004 Recruit Ratings – Scout.com: http://scouthoops.scout.com/a.z?s=75&p= ... atingValue

2-Star Brian Roberts is rated ‘dead last’ on Scout.com’s ratings of 2004 prospects in which Dayton showed interest.


Dayton’s HS Class of 2008 Recruit Ratings – Scout.com: http://scouthoops.scout.com/a.z?s=75&p= ... atingValue

2-Star Chris Johnson is rated near the bottom of Scout.com’s ratings of 2008 prospects in which Dayton showed interest.


In 2013-14, Brian Roberts (New Orleans Pelicans) and Chris Johnson (Boston Celtics) both enjoyed fine seasons.

Player rankings can be a crapshoot.
User avatar
Fieldhouse Flyer
 
Posts: 1389
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 5:11 am

Re: Player Rankings Can Be a Crapshoot

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Player Rankings Can Be a Crapshoot

Postby flyerlax06 » Thu May 15, 2014 1:02 pm

Scout.com's is arguably the worst of the major ones.
____________________________
“I like when we’re overlooked. We’re going to bite some asses…believe me when I tell you that.”
Ed Cooley

Providence College '10
User avatar
flyerlax06
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 12:48 pm

Re: Player Rankings Can Be a Crapshoot

Postby hoyahooligan » Thu May 15, 2014 1:10 pm

Stupid argument.

The number of 5 star recruits that succeed and 4 star recruits that succeed is much higher than the 3 Star or 2 star players that succeed. Doesn't mean it doesn't happen, just that for every Roberts or McDermott there are hundreds if not thousands who no one has ever heard of and never will.
hoyahooligan
 
Posts: 1488
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2013 6:43 pm

Re: Player Rankings Can Be a Crapshoot

Postby Fieldhouse Flyer » Thu May 15, 2014 1:40 pm

As everyone already knows, the Butler Bulldogs played in the NCAA Tournament National Championship games in 2010 and 2011: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butler_Bul ... basketball , beating a very impressive list of teams along the way.


Here’s a look at Butler’s relevant recruiting classes:

Butler’s HS Class of 2006: (4 recruits; all Zero-Stars; seniors in 2010): https://rivals.yahoo.com/basketballrecr ... Butler-165

Butler’s HS Class of 2007: (4 recruits; a 4-Star, a 3-Star and two 2-Stars; juniors in 2010): https://rivals.yahoo.com/basketballrecr ... Butler-165

Butler’s HS Class of 2008: (5 recruits; three 3-Stars and two 2-Stars; sophomores in 2010): https://rivals.yahoo.com/basketballrecr ... Butler-165

Butler’s HS Class of 2009: (1 recruit; a 3-Star; freshman in 2010): https://rivals.yahoo.com/basketballrecr ... Butler-165

Butler’s HS Class of 2010: (3 recruits; two 3-Stars and one zero-stars; HS seniors in 2010): https://rivals.yahoo.com/basketballrecr ... Butler-165


In short, in the 2010 and 2011 NCAA Tournaments, Brad Stevens’ teams beat UTEP, Murray State, Syracuse, Kansas State, Michigan State, Old Dominion, Pittsburgh, Wisconsin, Florida, and VCU with only one Rivals Top 100 recruit on his roster – 6’7” PF # 26 Matt Howard (# 91 in Rivals 150 / HS Class of 2007).

Brad Stevens: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brad_Stevens
User avatar
Fieldhouse Flyer
 
Posts: 1389
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 5:11 am

Re: Player Rankings Can Be a Crapshoot

Postby FormulaX » Thu May 15, 2014 1:45 pm

I'm sure, you would just care less, if Dayton had a top 20 recruiting class.
FormulaX
 
Posts: 200
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 10:54 am

Re: Player Rankings Can Be a Crapshoot

Postby Edrick » Thu May 15, 2014 3:27 pm

This has been verified through study over and over. Recruiting rankings do matter.

Here is one....

http://basketball.realgm.com/article/22 ... s-In-Depth


-----------------

Last week's NFL Draft:

https://twitter.com/LindseyThiry/status ... 9165033473

"@slmandel: Four- and five-star recruits proved 995% more likely to get drafted than others. Wow.Via "
User avatar
Edrick
 
Posts: 884
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:06 am

Re: Player Rankings Can Be a Crapshoot

Postby Jet915 » Thu May 15, 2014 3:48 pm

Edrick wrote:This has been verified through study over and over. Recruiting rankings do matter.

Here is one....

http://basketball.realgm.com/article/22 ... s-In-Depth


-----------------

Last week's NFL Draft:

https://twitter.com/LindseyThiry/status ... 9165033473

"@slmandel: Four- and five-star recruits proved 995% more likely to get drafted than others. Wow.Via "


Nice article.
User avatar
Jet915
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5832
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: Player Rankings Can Be a Crapshoot

Postby SJHooper » Fri May 16, 2014 8:19 am

Rankings do matter in the long run. Everyone seems to like pointing out that McDermott was a 2 star or other famously low-rated kids who turned out to be studs. What they fail to acknowledge is that this is hitting the lottery. It probably happens once a lifetime if it ever happens at all. For every McDermott there are thousands of bums rated similarly.

Who's at the top of the recruit rankings every year? Cuse, Duke, Kentucky, Florida, Michigan, Louisville, etc. They are full of 4 and 5 star players every year. The key though is getting players ranked in the top 5 nationally. There seems to be quite a dropoff from say the #2 or #3 player nationally and the #25+ nationally. Just by eyeballing, they shouldn't be much different, but they are. The top 10 players are the ones that more times than not turnout to be superstars in the NBA.

Kevin Durant: #2
LeBron James: #1
Andrew Wiggins: #1
Anthony Davis: #2
Carmelo Anthony: #1
Dwight Howard: #1
Derrick Rose: #3
John Wall: #1

(As per Rivals)

This is why rankings are so important. This is why Kansas, Duke, Kentucky, and Cuse rule college hoops. When you get top 5 kids you get superstars. It's rare that even a #25+ player becomes a superstar in the NBA. So there is a big dropoff once you leave the top 10.
SJHooper
 
Posts: 856
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 9:44 pm


Return to Big East basketball message board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 30 guests